McShay Mocks Us Ty Simpson At 13

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
#13 to me should see a lot of snaps as a rookie, as an expectation.

It’s a long season, so not playing a ton week 1-6 is a ripple we’ll forget about by the Superbowl.

I think McVay can get Tate, Lemon, Cooper going in the offense quicker than maybe a guy like Sadiq.
well, if they draft a wr at 13 he’s better pick up blocking assignments right quick or else he won’t see much pt.
McVay expects a lot out of his offense skill positions which is why many don’t play early
 
You may be right, but I have seen every game Sadiq played, and he will develop into something special. If allowed to do so under a coach like McVay, we're talking All-Pro level type of player before the end of his first contract. But he's not a WR? And #13 is too early to take another tight end? Snead doesn't necessarily think that way. His addition would allow McVay to run 12 and 13 personnel like no one in today's NFL has seen. With Puka and Adams, and Parkinson or Ferguson as well, you don't think McVay will be able to get one-on-ones with LBs on Sadiq? Who has run a 4.39? And can block? He could be an H back as well. Can even hand it off to him at times. Forget about the position for one minute and look at the PLAYER.
Damn he must have had 2k yards for Oregon last season if he was that good.
 
Well like I said, any rookie drafted at 13 could see an uptick in PT if there is an injury or otherwise. Im just not of the belief that McVay is going in to the draft looking at that 13th pick thinking that they need the player to be a big contributor

Totally agree with these, and your other comments.

And I'll also say the Rams won't be drafting for "need" in the 1st or 2nd rounds. Sure, if they have to choose between 2 players that they have rated the same, sure - take the player at the position of need.

I also think that teams who draft a QB and expect him to start and be productive immediately is just insane.
Fans might expect this (and coaches who are on the hot seat might hope for it), but it's asking a lot of a 22 year old.
 
Damn he must have had 2k yards for Oregon last season if he was that good.
I guess the same could have been said for Puka. There are many great pros who for many reasons didn't do as well statistically in college. Someone is going to take him, and it better not be SF or Philly.
 
  • High Five
Reactions: kmramsfan
I guess the same could have been said for Puka. There are many great pros who for many reasons didn't do as well statistically in college. Someone is going to take him, and it better not be SF or Philly.
Puka wasn't sold as a top 15 bill of goods. He went round 5.
 
  • Thread Winner
Reactions: dieterbrock
Idk man, I don't have any reason to watch Broncos games but Bo seems like a pretty promising young QB from the little I have seen. No young QB is going to be Stafford tier or play without making mistakes but "fine" seems like an objectively low bar to clear for a guy who is 2nd all time rookie passing TDs and 3rd all time for the most passing TDs in his first two seasons.
I mean, he's not the 32nd best starter in the league and he's got some things going for him and he's shown improvement since year one but I still see drives that implode with him, too many 3 and outs and inconsistent ability to take advantage of the middle of the field.

He's with the best QB coach in the NFL and been buttressed by the best oline in football two years ago and a pretty damn good one last year along with a legit X receiver.

I think at the end of the day, watch four games of his from last year: try 1st Chiefs game, Bills game, 1st raiders game and Dallas game. I've included two good and two bad to review. Come to your own conclusions.
 
Last edited:
Wow. Did you read the article? I have rarely seen such a nothing filled piece of useless words. And... NFL celebrity?

I'm not trying to shoot the messenger here, so no offense meant to you. But this was just filler material for their website. To call this Washingtonian a hack is being very nice. He even essentially says he has no contact with anyone in the Rams organization. He knows less than practically anyone here when it comes to the Rams. And several of his "articles'" titles are jabs at the Rams with nothing to back them up. Words like "snubs", "chaos", "dumps them", "foolish" in his titles hint at his feel for the Rams. I honestly suspect he is a Shecock fan. Anyway, this dude is just a bad writer with absolutely zero insight.
 
Still comes down to performing at a high level as a pro vs college
Some guys can handle volume in an offense. So I think that's a really nice trait to see a player show in college, and it infers that he can probably do the same in the NFL. Provided of course that his skills translate.

So with Kupp as an example I think playing at the lower level of ball hurt him. That and his forty, though if you look at him as an undersized TE move weapon, his value shows. But there was still the lower level of ball. Puka may have gone round 2 if he didn't have the injury questions, hard to say but he definitely was an injury risk type flag on team boards I'd say.

Sadiq is a lottery ticket type. But I prefer Stowers, who is nearly as athletic but also has that smoothness in the pattern McVay's offense requires to produce. I think Stowers would be an ideal Puka backup or replacement pick. He should absolutely be on the board. Nobody is crazy high on him. But if we take him, he's the seam and wheel threat this offense could really use and he's big and athletic enough to line him up out wide in redzone.

Again if they take Sadiq I'll cross my fingers, but I think he'll be another upside pick we whiff on. Just how I see it. I may end up being way wrong, but I see a large RB when I watch him. Not the weapon type this offense favors in that slot role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ram Ts and Noregar
Also and btw Boston can also play inside if necessary. He would be best in the X role as the forgotten rookie who sees easy matchups in 2026. But he's got the size and movement and bodying ability to own the middle. It's one of the reasons I think he upgrades us outside the hash, as he opens up the inbreaking routes where Adams is contact shy.
 
Really? You don't really believe that do you?
Sure, why not? He was a highly recruited 4 star athlete who missed significant time due to injury. Had he followed up his big 1st year with another one, I dont see why being a 2nd or 3rd rounder would have been out of the question.
1st round? Ok, I embellished a bit there....
 
Sure, why not? He was a highly recruited 4 star athlete who missed significant time due to injury. Had he followed up his big 1st year with another one, I dont see why being a 2nd or 3rd rounder would have been out of the question.
1st round? Ok, I embellished a bit there....
Big 1st year? He had 168 yards. 151 his second. Are you talking about his 1st year with BYU? I could see 3rd round - maybe even sneaking into the 2nd. 1st? Yeah, that's some "embellishment" for sure. :laugh4:

Cheers man.
 
  • HaHa
Reactions: dieterbrock
Some guys can handle volume in an offense. So I think that's a really nice trait to see a player show in college, and it infers that he can probably do the same in the NFL. Provided of course that his skills translate.

So with Kupp as an example I think playing at the lower level of ball hurt him. That and his forty, though if you look at him as an undersized TE move weapon, his value shows. But there was still the lower level of ball. Puka may have gone round 2 if he didn't have the injury questions, hard to say but he definitely was an injury risk type flag on team boards I'd say.

Sadiq is a lottery ticket type. But I prefer Stowers, who is nearly as athletic but also has that smoothness in the pattern McVay's offense requires to produce. I think Stowers would be an ideal Puka backup or replacement pick. He should absolutely be on the board. Nobody is crazy high on him. But if we take him, he's the seam and wheel threat this offense could really use and he's big and athletic enough to line him up out wide in redzone.

Again if they take Sadiq I'll cross my fingers, but I think he'll be another upside pick we whiff on. Just how I see it. I may end up being way wrong, but I see a large RB when I watch him. Not the weapon type this offense favors in that slot role.
Apparently, Stowers can't block or wasnt used that way. I think Sadiq in the run game adds another domension if they use him as an H-back/move TE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RamFan58years
Apparently, Stowers can't block or wasnt used that way. I think Sadiq in the run game adds another domension if they use him as an H-back/move TE.
Again I think that has been overplayed.

Because TE is a position where they lump together the inline and move types, he is not in the class of the inline dudes who can solo edges. However he is just as capable in blocking as any slot wideout you might draft. Plus he's 6'4" and runs faster than Tate.

As the slot weapon he is, the dude is fine as a blocker. Willingness is there. This isn't some primadonna shithead, he's a good kid and fit I think.