- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 35,350
- Name
- Stu
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11791/11791fcb61307bb07e23445051c40a82c023c055" alt="Mood: Youngblood"
I always think that argument of who has the leverage is overblown. The player has the talent and the team owns the purse strings. Yeah sometimes a player can have the team over a barrel but more often than not, it seems that there are other things at play that determine how negotiations go. The market for the player, the team’s power at the position, and where a team can go within cap constraints pretty much dictate the offer.I really think they don't have all the leverage. If they don't agree to a contract, it causes a huge headache for the organization to look for his replacement in a shitty QB market. Stafford and his agent know they are by far the Rams best option at winning right now. This whole he's under contract for 2 years means squat if he holds out. With that said, the part I respect about our front office is they don't dick around when it comes to tough decisions. Not saying it will, but if it somehow got ugly on the business side, I know they will not hesitate to rip the band-aid off and do what they have to do. I don't see it going down like that, but we'll all find what truly happens in time.
Of course “cap constraints “ is always that thing shrouded in mystery. A lot of guys on here know way more about the cap than I do but even they often get blind sided by how it truly works.