DragonOfBlood
Rookie
But he does have a point, no? MLB wanted McCourt out so bad, the Dodgers ended up getting a huge break with respect to the amount of money they have to pay MLB in revenue sharing for their TV deal. I've read it saved them close to 66 mil per year. That's got nothing to do with scouting and development, etc. In a cap-less league, that's 66 mil more on top of the advantage they hold over other teams because of their market.
Here's a way to look at it. The Yankees and Dodgers have similar markets. The Yankees pay 100 mil in revenue sharing for their TV deal with YES Network, the Dodgers pay about 28 mil. That's some advantage over the Yankees (72 mil) and exponentially more over teams like Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, etc.
Baseball needs a HARD cap and a much stronger revenue sharing plan. Then it's popularity will soar.
That dude absolutely fits the description of "any Dodgers fan that says otherwise is either a liar, some bandwagoner who wasn't a fan of the team in 2012, or just willfully ignorant" so wasting your typing on him, regardless of how factual your argument is, is a fool's errand.
The Dodgers get away with doing things other teams simply cannot do and it's ridiculous when their fans pretend otherwise. It's even more ridiculous to remember that back-to-back ownership groups that were nothing but putrid incompetence paved the way for the Dodgers recent prosperity.
By all rights they should still be the festering pile they were back when News Corp ran the joint.