Not saying that I want him . But with Denver supposedly going to Tag miller. Brock will most likely hit market. If so would you be mad if rams signed him
Is Brock Osweiler a option?
- Thread starter lockdnram21
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Why on earth would anyone (including me) would be mad?????
It's a roster move, one that may be beneficial. No point in being butthurt.
It's a roster move, one that may be beneficial. No point in being butthurt.
He's a good QB, coming from a good Team, Why not!! But I don't see the Bronco's letting him go with-out a fight!!
woofwoofmo
65 Toss Power Trap
G Att Comp Pct Att/G Yds Avg Yds/G TD TD% Int Int% Lng 20+ 40+ Sck SckY Rate
A 6 125 76 60.8 20.8 828 6.6 138 4 3.2 1 0.8 60T 7 2 4 28 87.7
B 8 275 170 61.8 34.4 1,967 7.2 245 10 3.6 6 2.2 72T 17 4 23 151 86.4
Which QB would you take?? A or B? Overall stats are fairly similar in % Comp, Avg Yds Catch, TD%, & QB rating. QB B has a higher interception rate and is much more likely to be sacked. QB A threw the ball about half as often as QB B. QB B had a much better receiving corps to work with.
QB A = Case Keenum
QB B = Brock Osweiler
Not sure the money spent on a big contract to Osweiler would get you a whole lot more than what you currently have with Keenum. Granted the sample size is small, but if I'm spending big bucks on a FA QB, I want a proven commodity.
A 6 125 76 60.8 20.8 828 6.6 138 4 3.2 1 0.8 60T 7 2 4 28 87.7
B 8 275 170 61.8 34.4 1,967 7.2 245 10 3.6 6 2.2 72T 17 4 23 151 86.4
Which QB would you take?? A or B? Overall stats are fairly similar in % Comp, Avg Yds Catch, TD%, & QB rating. QB B has a higher interception rate and is much more likely to be sacked. QB A threw the ball about half as often as QB B. QB B had a much better receiving corps to work with.
QB A = Case Keenum
QB B = Brock Osweiler
Not sure the money spent on a big contract to Osweiler would get you a whole lot more than what you currently have with Keenum. Granted the sample size is small, but if I'm spending big bucks on a FA QB, I want a proven commodity.
Last edited:
No way he leaves Denver....so no need to consider this...
I hope we don't pay ANOTHER FA QB $12 mill a year B4 he does ANYTHING in the pros...
I hope we don't pay ANOTHER FA QB $12 mill a year B4 he does ANYTHING in the pros...
Elmgrovegnome
Legend
Depends on the cost, but if it is high, no thanks. He has not proven himself worth a big contract.
Couldn't Denver Transition tag him? Or can they only use one tag per offseason?
Couldn't Denver Transition tag him? Or can they only use one tag per offseason?
I think Osweiler hits FA. Why? Because Elway doesn't settle.
If they do bring him back it will be at a non-bank-breaking rate. And they'll probably move up in the draft for one of those 3 QBs.
If they do bring him back it will be at a non-bank-breaking rate. And they'll probably move up in the draft for one of those 3 QBs.
With the exception of the New England game, he was pretty mediocre IMO.
I could see him become successful in Denver but only because of his familiarity with the players and scheme.
Poor mans Matt Cassell
I could see him become successful in Denver but only because of his familiarity with the players and scheme.
Poor mans Matt Cassell