A55VA6
Legend
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
- Messages
- 8,208
Colts or Saints. Two playoff teams we made our bitch!I've got the night free, thinking about re-watching one of the games from this year. Which one should I watch?
Lolol!!!
Still disturbing when I'm called by my first name. It's like... how much more crap they got on me? Haha
Haha! Yeah I know. It catches me my surprise every time, though.
That cat... lol. Perfect
You too huhOh I thought it said you expect a false start ... Sorry.
Sincerely,
Alex Barron
Rams are natoriously slow starters. Seems 1-3, 2-3, or at best 2-2 is the theme every year. This year I think we get spotted 4 games before the real tests begin against with our rivals.
Vs Minn- W
@ TB- W
Vs. DAl-W
Bye
PHI- W
We have two weeks to prepare for Philly. These early games will be crucial confidence builders for our young team. Then we face the toughest stretch of our schedule. Niners twice, ARZ, and the Seagulls in a five week span. Being our second half is much weaker than the first, getting a head start is a necessity. That five week span dictates our season to a large degree. If we can go 4-1-1 two years ago in the NFCW, I don't see how we don't stand a good chance to at least go .500 against the NFCW, or better. . That should be enough to have us controlling our own destiny down the stretch.
Wow......you have us winning AT PHI?
I like it.
I like the division games for intensity....the 2nd seattle game in 13 was amazing for me...to see the D really shut down seattle at home until the late 3rd quarter when Langford lost it....very impresive...the Rams, not counting QB, were and are the better team....QB is important, come on Bradford show me as true!I've got the night free, thinking about re-watching one of the games from this year. Which one should I watch?
I'm not overly concerned, Minn. Has a New HC, a New QB, and a New scheme. I wouldn't worry too much about them in wk.#1. Maybe if we were playing them in wk. 6 or 8, but not in wk.1!Many believe that this team needs a fast start. It would be nice I'm not convinced it's necessary. I guess I'm just not in awe of the remaining teams on the schedule. Some of those teams might be better than expected, but some might be worse and take a Falcons / Texans like tumble. No one knows.
One game at a time.
And that Vikings opening day contest concerns me if they can get that running game going strong again.
It will happen, and for good reason...what I hope doesn't happen, but very likely it will, if this team doesn't get off the that 4-1 start that so many seem to think is necessary, how many people will be jumping ship and saying her we go again.
AZ won 10 games and missed out on the playoffs. Why? Look at week one vs our beloved Rams. The Cards fans will all tell you the same thing.As I mentioned earlier in this thread, the one that thing that stands out about Fisher coached teams, is they always get better as the season progresses. I can envision a scenario, especially again being so young, that they don't get out of the gate as fast as many think they "need" to, but they still manage a 10 win season.
If we can't win at least 3 of the first 4, we'll be looking at another .500 season with that schedule.
I expect them to come out blazing this year.