- Joined
- Aug 15, 2012
- Messages
- 3,801
Even if it means having to bench or trade someone on your team who is very good instead of addressing weaknesses?
I can see the validity of the philosophy. I just have a slightly different one. That said, if I had to choose one, I'd choose your (apparently) pure BPA philosophy over a pure Need philosophy any day.
its not pure BPA but when picking this high in the draft you're looking for franchise altering players. it just so happens all of the top guys are a need with the exception of Clowney, but you can never have enough pass rushers, and I'm only suggesting him if we feel he's the once in a generation talent some people think he is.