Ramer
Been a Ram fan too long to quit now
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2014
- Messages
- 1,813
better than seeing your....errrrr you're nutsI guess we're just a bunch of nuts!
better than seeing your....errrrr you're nutsI guess we're just a bunch of nuts!
Since the Rams supposedly did some exploring with Gilmore and now they are talking to Matthieu, I'm going to guess Gilmore wants the moon. The Patriots didn't give him the huge contract and now the Panthers don't want to either. He's missed some games in recent years. He's still a great man corner but its tough sledding to demand big money with a recent injury history.The Rams have 4 promising safeties so I’d rather they go for Gillmore/CB/edge
That’s a no brainer.Our secondary would benefit more from Gilmore than Mathieu. We're deeper at S than CB.
Not a fan despite all the flashy career numbers. No thanks.
From what I’ve read they feel TM would be a very good slot corner for the Rams, not a safety.Mathieu can't be happy with his market. He's been a bit of an afterthought coming off a down year where he was probably trying to stay healthy in his FA season, and safety has never been a big money position. So if the Rams do get him it will need to be at a number they like.
If they add him they don't have to sweat the safety room at all and then they focus on corner and edge in the draft. The drawback would be he gets in the way of Scott who might have a chance to be a starter. But I'd still do it because losing JJ was significant. There was a vacuum back there all season. None of those guys rates the type of take where you'd say "well they'll bounce back this year." We have a bunch of strong safety types in that room and need a damn baller.
All that aside there are some safeties in this draft that damn. Butler for example who won't get to us. I don't normally like looking at them because it's so hard to see wtf they're doing in the secondary without all 22. But there's definitely some deep middle ranging types who could help us so I'm fine with them going that route too. Thing is if you can add something good enough to the mix now it frees up that pick for more BPA type thinking which is good for the team.
Blind squirrel analogy = My lifeI haven't seen any other source linking Mathieu to the Rams. The guy was right before but maybe it was due to the blind squirrel analogy?
He's too long in the tooth for the slot IMO. Especially with teams featuring top weapons in the slot around the league. I'd play him over the top as part of that pairing when we're in Cover 2/4/6. We need a ballhawk back there IMO. Rams have very little threat to QBs in the QB/Safety game.From what I’ve read they feel TM would be a very good slot corner for the Rams, not a safety.
However his versatility could allow them to move him around.
Rams mentioned today by Rapsheet
View: https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1511769066331152391?s=20&t=wG_3kI3VfOTgLtVuv7i4Xw
In Mathieu’s final season with the Kansas City Chiefs, he went to the Pro Bowl after tallying 60 tackles, a sack , three interceptions and three fumbles recovered.“Any time I see the Saints play defense, I always tap myself on the shoulder and say, ‘Hey, I could probably roll with those guys,’” Mathieu said, via Sports Illustrated. “I don’t think they really need me, but it would be good to go back home and help them win.”
I agree that honey badger seems to not be a fan of the Rams. I’d guess we won’t likely end up with him. But who knows with Snead.My perspective on Matthieu as someone who is not a fan: if the rams think he will add something significant, then do it.
I don’t like him because he seems like an overly emotional almost whiny player who points fingers a lot and is too prideful (yes, get off my lawn and all that). But I can get over that if they feel he is a significant piece that will help the defense scheme for success.
it is boring, not doubt, but in other words, I’ll put my personal bias aside if Les and Sean tell me to.