Couldn't agree moreThats what I was thinkin. As much as I love what he could bring, if we can get 2 #1's for the #2 pick plus anything else I think we have to take it.
Buccaneers could probably go WR as well at #7 and Lions at #10. So we'll have to use the number 2 pick on Watkins if that's who they want. Or drop down to the Browns spot at 4 and take Watkins there.
I love it, but I'm not sure if Pryor would make it that far.Trade 1.2 to Cleveland for 1.4 and 1.26
Rams 1st Round Selections:
1.4 - Watkins
1.13 - Lewan
1.26 - Pryor
Second Round:
2.4 - Yankey
2.13 - Best DL / LB / CB available...
Trade 1.2 to Cleveland for 1.4 and 1.26
Rams 1st Round Selections:
1.4 - Watkins
1.13 - Lewan
1.26 - Pryor
Second Round:
2.4 - Yankey
2.13 - Best DL / LB / CB available...
I would say 6th ... at the lowest. One thing we don't seem to factor in is somebody trading up for Sammy!. Not to the #2 spot ... .but definitely in the 4-6 range.How far do you guys think we can realistically drop and still pick him?
Don't matter where he lives in the off season!They must have told him that he will be living in LA in a couple of years.
Sold!
J/k
I want Sammy W so bad on this team ... but not so sure that Snead/Fisher are ready to give up on Givens/Quick just yet
K - now that's funny right there.Don't matter where he lives in the off season!
Personally I'm tired of waiting on quick and think sammie will be better year one then quick will be this coming yearI'm kind of in both camps. I totally salivate at the idea of having Sammy on the team, but i don't want to give up on Quick yet. I feel like he has the potential, and if he does turn into the player I and others think he can be then we have more pressing needs in the draft than taking Watkins.
Personally I'm tired of waiting on quick and think sammie will be better year one then quick will be this coming year
Really? Because 20 rookie receivers had more receiving yards than Quick last year, were they all worth taking in the top 5, too?I think WTkins could surpass Quicks total stats in his first year. That in itself makes him worth taking.
Really? Because 20 rookie receivers had more receiving yards than Quick last year, were they all worth taking in the top 5, too?
Well, we already know the former didn't happen in the middle of February lol.Back to the twitter thing. I bet the Rams told him they are taking him at #2 if they can't trade the pick. Either that or the just got him really jacked up from their meeting and he couldn't contain himself.