- Joined
- Jun 1, 2013
- Messages
- 7,867
- Name
- Tron
I've seen better performances by drunk people singing bad karaoke. That was bad.You sure about that?
You must not have seen Corey Feldman's music performance debut on the Today Show.
I've seen better performances by drunk people singing bad karaoke. That was bad.You sure about that?
You must not have seen Corey Feldman's music performance debut on the Today Show.
AssholeWell, gee, I'll try to clean that up for you going forward.
Alright, I hear you, and thanks for setting me straight. I haven't been around here too long, so I'm not yet totally aware of the dynamics or structure behind everything.
To reiterate and hopefully explain myself better, his comment rubbed me the wrong way, and so I pointed it out, and expressed my opinion on it poorly. I perceived his response as derisively sarcastic, and so I answered in kind.
That's how it went for me, and I only meant to stand my ground, and didn't mean to be especially disrespectful.
I'll accept that I was in the wrong on this one, so I'll apologize to X, specifically, and I apologize here to anyone else who found my lack of respect out of line.
So we're going to continue to rely on field goals. That's cool I guess.
Nothing to see here.@X takes it as a compliment.same as I wouldopcorn:
Even if u take away all the drops he still looked horrible
Keenum did alright against the Bucs last year. We should be okay.
Though, that might have been the mystique of the mustard.
Who knows.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXWsaVBEhlQ
He had some awkward moments to say the least, but he had some good passes as well. Hopefully all of that awkwardness is gone from his game and hopefully he will look much better with the 1s in game later this year. But I think he looked better than 4 year pro Keenum did against the whiners.Even if u take away all the drops he still looked horrible
I might if I wasn't afraid of getting shanked by one of their gang member fans.Yes it can.
Ask the Raiders.
Just in case you change your mind, I've got an extra stick.http://www.latimes.com/sports/rams/la-sp-rams-20160919-snap-story.html
Not going to beat a dead horse on this one. I'm disappointed. We'll see if he changes his mind come Week 4. I think the poster who said Week 5 at the earliest is probably right.
I'm keen to see Goff start too but I'm not sure Keenum was the problem on Sunday.
If the running game had been up to scratch and a couple of drops were catches instead, the picture would be very different.
I'll be annoyed if we have to wait until 2017 to see Goff but, at the same time, I'd like to see the running game fixed before he's thrown in.
Now this is some hilarious Fisher fuzzy math bullcrap.
From the article........
“Our opener was a team loss and I don’t blame it on Case. Nor do I give credit to Case for this win …”
So...he doesn't give Case credit for the win, but...he gives him a Game Ball.![]()
Not surprising. They were saying on the broadcast that he may sit the whole year.
I don't see the benefit to sitting him. Does Keenum give you a better chance to win? If the answer is yes, I still don't see Keenum leading enough offensive production to help win games. The defense will start facing much tougher offenses starting next week. They won't be able to win without the offense getting at minimum 20 points a game.
It'd be funny if Fisher started Goff after giving Keenum the game ball the previous game. Effed up. But funny.
Word of advice: Generally speaking, the media guys simply cannot read Fish. It's normally best to ignore whatever they think he's thinking.
Keenum has the league's worst quarterback rating at 57.8 right now. I don't understand how Fisher continues to justify starting Keenum still.