Every team's worst First Round Pick of the last 10 years

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

AZRams

What, we're all thinking it...
Joined
Feb 6, 2019
Messages
3,892

One of those dumb MSN lists. Only post if for this gem re: the Rams

It's hard to say which has been their worst first-round pick in the last 10 years when the Rams have had just TWO in this period. Since drafting Jared Goff in 2016, the Rams selected in the first round of the Draft again in 2024, picking Jared Verse. Verse was the Defensive Rookie of the Year in 2024, so it should've been Goff by default. But Goff wasn't a bad player, and his trade to the Lions gave the Rams Matthew Stafford and a Super Bowl ring. Instead of putting Goff purely by lack of options, I choose to tip my hat to Les Snead.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
42,716
Les wriggles out of this one to some extent by getting rid of so many first round picks.

But I think his drafting has improved in the past few years, and that might have to do with his group and the Rams coaches continuing to refine the definition of what they are looking for in the players. Or maybe better effort on finding players who love the game idk. Whatever it is, those high ceiling types who have some iffy elements seem to be avoided for the most part nowadays and damn near every pick is someone that I either like or will like after I look at more of their film. That was not always the case in Les and Sean's early days of drafting together.

Going back 3+ years to get a fair look at the draft hauls... Note that the 2023 Draft looks like an elite haul still to this day, a true masterpiece and Les' best effort in his time with the Rams. And the 2024 Draft might be on par with it, though there's a long way to go and things can change dramatically in a couple more years. So sticking with the older drafts...

2022 Draft
1749835623268.png

Williams and Lake are starters. Durant has been more a rotational depth type but we'll see what he does this year. Kendrick is similar, like Durant he can fill a role for you. And Yeast rounds out three good rotational types for the depth chart.

Two starters and three good depth players is a hell of a haul in a round 3-7 draft.

2021 Draft
1749836274258.png

I think this draft was very important to Les and Sean in that something occurred afterwards in their evaluation of players. Simply put they raised the bar after this draft and since this draft we have three hauls of players that seem to be very focused in on players who fit all around, not just in terms of let's say upside in the scheme.

Jones was a starter, though I think the knee killed what was already questionable mobility at the position so he's a between the tackles thumper, i.e. two down backer. Atwell is an upside tease who might have finally put it all together if the separation metrics are to be believed, however I am still waiting on him to actually produce. Brown was a bit of a slug who required someone motivating him to get the game out of him. Skow was a good teams addition and depth rotation player, as well as a decent lead blocker when used for it.

So one starter, a tease, and a couple iffy depth types is what I would consider a rather poor return. Not a fan of this draft.

I'd love to see Jourdan do an interview with Les on this time period and draft and what the Rams did behind the scenes to change their approach. Because I am convinced something significant was achieved in their analysis of how they were drafting and we have been on a roll benefitting from it since.
 

TSFH Fan

Epic Music Guy
Joined
Dec 5, 2014
Messages
1,699
I'd love to see Jourdan do an interview with Les on this time period and draft and what the Rams did behind the scenes to change their approach. Because I am convinced something significant was achieved in their analysis of how they were drafting and we have been on a roll benefitting from it since.

Jourdan kinda, sorta did:

In 2022, when Blake was hired full-time out of Stanford’s MBA program, she and Temme began installing a process to turn the anecdotal moments in a decision-making process, such as Hill’s voice changing, into quantifiable evidence for or against the selection of a player during the crucial minutes of a pick.

Gathering this information also helps Blake engage in unique debates with Snead away from the rest of the group. On a particular day in January, Snead moved a player up one bucket on his call sheet and moved another down when the area scout expressed his excitement about the first player and as Gladstone drew out a comparison between the two.

During a break, Snead poked his head into Blake’s office. Didn’t Snead think he should simply expand the bucket instead of moving the second player out of it, she asked. The coaching staff, who would soon begin its first wave of draft evaluations, would get an initial exposure to only that first bucket of players, with the next bucket to follow a few weeks after. Getting on coaches’ desks in the first bucket is often a good thing for the player, but if the scouting staff was able to compare the first player to the second — unaware of the movement by Snead on the call sheet — shouldn’t the coaches do the same?