C Patterson.

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
If it was for a late round pick, absolutely. At worst he's an elite KR and at his best, given some time, he can be a top WR in this league, he has elite potential. Why not?

This is also exactly why he won't get traded.
 
They aren't giving up on him - just letting him learn. We all knew he was raw coming out - but still if a guy isn't all pro immediately, then he is somehow worthless.
 
jjab360 said:
Patterson is still on his relatively cheap rookie contract, what do you mean?
Click to expand...
I mean when making up a cap you can afford X amount of dollars per position and I'm thinking we are probably at the limit ,a first round rookie contract is more than the guy he'd replace unless it was TA .
 
Thordaddy said:
I mean when making up a cap you can afford X amount of dollars per position and I'm thinking we are probably at the limit ,a first round rookie contract is more than the guy he'd replace unless it was TA .
Click to expand...
Patterson is only making 1.8M Per, that's only .4M per year more than Quick or Britt, for example. We just picked up Barron who's making twice as much as Patterson without any problem, and we were supposedly already right up against the cap.

Players taken that late in the first round don't really make that much money anymore, they have hardly any cap implications relative to the players they replace.
 
jjab360 said:
Patterson is only making 1.8M Per, that's only .4M per year more than Quick or Britt, for example. We just picked up Barron who's making twice as much as Patterson without any problem, and we were supposedly already right up against the cap.

Players taken that late in the first round don't really make that much money anymore, they have hardly any cap implications relative to the players they replace.
Click to expand...
AND IF we trade or let Austin go because we had Patterson his g jack gets accelerated ,but there is that 5th year option thing,have to admit I didn't check Pattersons salary .
I don't think we need two return guys who aren't very effective WR's, so IMO it's either or
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back