- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 34,838
- Name
- Stu
Not even close. Most NFL refs have "other jobs" but it is because they are generally no where near retirement age and have half the year to do other things. NFL refs ON AVERAGE back in 2019 made more than $200k . It's a simple falacy.The average NFL ref makes 27k. They literally depend on other jobs.
You are co-mingling issues in anti-trust. The courts did not decide and the NFL did not argue that they were not a sport. The league argued that they were a sports league operating as a single unit of 32 teams in the entertainment industry. The idea of being a sport or entertainment has little to nothing to do with this. The NFL enjoys exemptions to anti-trust laws because they are a league and need to operate as a league or it simply doesn't work. Where you are right is that Goodell was not required to hand over that evidence largely because the league has voluntarily put him in the position to essentially be sole arbitrator until they decide as a unit that he is no longer fit to do so. It is more akin to a CEO deciding if a company policy was violated.If the NFL were a sport under anti-trust, Goodell couldn't have unilaterally decided to destroy the evidence.
I honestly don't understand why they haven't done this. The NFL showed that they can quickly determine if a call was missed, catch made, etc... as they did it in the playoffs with virtually the same thing you are suggesting. I'm not suggesting you stop after every play. And things like the first Eagles TD probably might not have changed as they got the snap off so quickly. But there was clear and solid proof that this could be done with virtually no interruption of the game.The NFL needs to put a ref in the booth and have them correct bad calls and non-calls, more so than what they are doing now. It's a bad look for the league. And while I don't necessarily believe they're rigging anything, I can't dismiss the refs engaging in bad conduct after what happened with Tim Donaghy and the NBA.
And I'm sorry but there is no reason not to apply this to penalties. So the fuck what if you hurt some feelings of a few refs - or all of them for that matter. Maybe it would light a fire under their asses to do a better job.
Let me get this straight. I'm a 15 year vet making a quarter mil a year for 5 months of work where I really only work weekends. And if I'm good at my job, I can make another $50 - $150 grand to add a few weeks to my work year. In my other job, I'm an attorney, a HS principal, or a business owner, etc... I'm going to quit my NFL gig because someone is real time grading my work? If that is enough of a hit to their ego to make them quit, maybe that is a good thing. I'm guessing there are a shit ton of well qualified college refs that would jump at the opportunity just opened up.while I agree on the ref in the booth, let's look at this from the refs on the field perspective.
You're a 15 year vet and after all this time all of a sudden somebody else starts telling you you are doing your job wrong , reversing calls you have made hundreds of times. Their egos would take a big hit and
there would be a constant turnover in officiating personnel as the more experienced ones would start retiring.
There's that. It seems odd to me that we can have replay but can only review certain things.Sometimes I think it would be better to just let refs call the game and live with the results all the reviews and replays and challenges haven’t gotten us anywhere.
My suggestion would be to get rid of "instant" replay and have the boys upstairs jump in when there is an obvious missed call. Don't make the coaches throw the red flag. And if the opposing team can snap the ball before the play is reviewed, more power to them.