they call it "programming" for a reason.It does boil down to 45 minutes over and over and over for ten hours after I've heard it twice I go to music or the tennis channel , but then I go back in the evening to catch up on the "BREAKING NEWS"
I work at home, and listen to sports radio from 7:00 in the morning to 5:00 in the evening. Both local and national (Patrick and Cowherd).
No one, and I mean NO ONE is treating the Rams as anything but an afterthought.
Every conversation re the NFC West starts out with "Rams are out of it", ...and then on to the superpowers, SEA and SF.
In the eyes of the nation, we are no different than the Browns, Raiders or Jags.
So...yes or no?
No offense, but thinking Hill is as good as Wilson answers the OPs question with a resounding yes.My take is that the rams are very similar to Seattle. They both have great defenses ( seattle is better in the secondary but the rams have a better front 7), they both have strong running games, and I can see Hill being as good as Wilson (they are both heady and good leaders, dont have the strongest arms in the world but get it done, and mobile enough). The rams potentially have better receivers and a better oline. The biggest question mark for this season is will the eams secondary be good enough and if they are they will make the playoffs.