OFFICIAL 2025 NFL News: Trades, cuts, free agency, and more

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
24,548
Yes, I remember Lovie liked Duncan, but I thought he recommended him as a replacement due to the Rams not wanting to pay Fletcher what he was worth.

I always thought that it was Lovie Smith who drove that decision.

He felt that Duncan was a better fit for his Tampa two defense because he wanted more athleticism and the ability to drop into coverage.
 

Allen2McVay

Legend
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
9,944
Name
Jim
Yes, I remember Lovie liked Duncan, but I thought he recommended him as a replacement due to the Rams not wanting to pay Fletcher what he was worth.
Perhaps but it's even more painful to know (in hindsight) that the difference in comp was so small.

Fletcher's five-year deal averaged a little-over $3M-per-year; compared to Duncan's five-year deal which averaged a little-over $2M-per-year. Just $1M per-year difference.

Add in that Fletcher was terrific for five season in Buffalo, while Duncan only lasted two years with the Rams.
 

majrleaged

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Messages
4,674
I always thought that it was Lovie Smith who drove that decision.

He felt that Duncan was a better fit for his Tampa two defense because he wanted more athleticism and the ability to drop into coverage.
You might be right. I just thought it was spin. Fletcher was better in every facet of LB and the Rams were notoriously cheap. At one point the Rams were tied with the worst record of the decade with cincy. Or something like that. Shaw told Martz it was better for the bottom line not to play in the SB.
 

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
7,516
I always thought that it was Lovie Smith who drove that decision.

He felt that Duncan was a better fit for his Tampa two defense because he wanted more athleticism and the ability to drop into coverage.
It was my understanding that they felt they could pay Fletcher or Little but not both.
 

VegasRam

Give your dog a hug.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
4,006
Name
Doug
Total agereement with the above re Fletcher, but in fairness they could not pay both Fletch and Little, and chose Little.
I know everyone hates him, but he was a very good DE. They just guessed wrong - shit happens.
It is true howerver that we have sucked at LB ever since, Laurinitus included.

Edit: @WestCoastRam- didn't see your post.
 
Last edited: