Which WR excites you the most for the Rams?

[Coliseum Ram]

I guess I view any top-100 draft choices (Rounds 1-3) as quality picks, where a team needs a fairly-high success-rate (meaning solid players or better). To me, 'Later in the Draft' suggests rounds 4-7.

If #69 overall (where Kupp was selected) constitutes 'later in the Draft', then the Rams' 2nd round pick (#61) would need to be compared to Van Jefferson and TuTu Atwell, who were both selected #57 overall.

Yeah I misunderstood that one when you said it..A2M

 

[Merlin]

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=B0PrNxyzq9k&pp=ugUEEgJlbg%3D%3D

I always enjoy listening to Cosell. He sums things up pretty good I think. I agree with him that Lemon is smooth and fits most teams, but he's not big and he's not explosive. This is why, as a USC fan, I'm not jumping on the table for him. He's the kind of player you want in your wideout corps, but he's gonna slot in the NFL and five years from now he'll be a good starter in the slot I am sure, so he's got a nice floor to him. But will he be a stud?

Hurst is interesting. I didn't like his drops, first off, and that plus the level of competition hurt him. But he's got length to him, and also has the wheels you want, so Cosell's right in saying he's the guy with all the tools you want in that X role.

For me personally I want an X addition that fits Stafford. Which means length, catch radius, toughness, and great hands. Which is why I like Boston so much. But Hurst or Fields would be fine as well, and I'd rather see us take a shot on that boundary role than add another fucking slot. Especially a slot who is smaller and generally inferior to the 6'2" benchmark that McVay slots have carried.

 

[Ram Ts]

I always enjoy listening to Cosell. He sums things up pretty good I think. I agree with him that Lemon is smooth and fits most teams, but he's not big and he's not explosive. This is why, as a USC fan, I'm not jumping on the table for him. He's the kind of player you want in your wideout corps, but he's gonna slot in the NFL and five years from now he'll be a good starter in the slot I am sure, so he's got a nice floor to him. But will he be a stud?

Hurst is interesting. I didn't like his drops, first off, and that plus the level of competition hurt him. But he's got length to him, and also has the wheels you want, so Cosell's right in saying he's the guy with all the tools you want in that X role.

For me personally I want an X addition that fits Stafford. Which means length, catch radius, toughness, and great hands. Which is why I like Boston so much. But Hurst or Fields would be fine as well, and I'd rather see us take a shot on that boundary role than add another fucking slot. Especially a slot who is smaller and generally inferior to the 6'2" benchmark that McVay slots have carried.

Bell -- if he makes it to us at 61.
Hopefully other teams want immediate production and pass on him. While we can be patient with him year one slowly getting back.

 

[WestCoastRam]

Bell -- if he makes it to us at 61.
Hopefully other teams want immediate production and pass on him. While we can be patient with him year one slowly getting back.

Bell's a lot of fun