The big thing we seem to be going round and round on though is that it seems, at times, that some of the people in the draft a tackle camp are creating a false dilemma: #1 WR or fix the OL. No one's saying don't fix the OL. What we're saying is that it's possible to do BOTH. Sure, you won't get your elite tackle (unless you want Lewan, which makes me very uneasy) or we do some fancy tradeups (or someone takes one HELL of a tumble). But it's not a choice of draft a tackle to play guard for who knows how long or OL is still broken.
And honestly, if we are going to draft a tackle, I want Matthews over Robinson... Robinson seems a real boom or bust type guy.
Seems to me that the actual dilemma is whether or not it makes sense to pass on a potential franchise OLineman (or other position),
who again may or may not play guard as rookies, vs. using such a high draft choice at what many consider one of, if not, the
DEEEEEPEST positions in the 2014 NFL Draft.
And with a roster already filled with young WRs still developing (which can't be said at OLine, btw) on
a Jeff Fisher coached team (Not Martz, but Fisher). And how some seem to know what others believe is impossible to know
yet regarding those young WRs already on the roster amazes me.
On top of that the player being touted is a kid that caught 70% of his passes within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage. It's mind boggling to me.