What constitutes "soundness" is subjective, but, and I know people are tired of others harping on it, choosing Tutu over Creed reveals a more philosophical issue at root. Investing in Whit, Sullivan, and even Corbett generated success, letting Saffold walk generated the opposite, etc. There's some weird aversion to adhering to what brought us success and failure, and the results are here. Boom wasn't going to replace Whit, a rookie or Shelton wasn't going to replace Corbett, and we already had run blocking issues with them. To me it's hard to argue the plan was "sound."