They would end up blocking each other.I'm not even sure two Bobby Evans could block one dude...
We do! We just used it last year which in the grand scheme is fine.Jesus, we got no love from the gods.
Or both. I would start Wolford, but have a few packages for Perkins to use his skills etc. The Cards would be caught off guard a bit and that adds a dimension of explosion to the offense. And this doesnt put too much on Perkins because he has imitations in the pasing game.I'm kinda interested in seeing what mcvay does with this "opportunity". I had already (mostly) written off the season, so I'm curious what he'll do if stafford doesn't play.
He could double down on our current offense with Wolford or try to implement a new scheme that takes advantage of Perkins mobility.
Thank you Mr. Evans for your great protection.
What do you mean? He's perfectly good at just throwing it up and having Cutch steal it out of the air.Or both. I would start Wolford, but have a few packages for Perkins to use his skills etc. The Cards would be caught off guard a bit and that adds a dimension of explosion to the offense. And this doesnt put too much on Perkins because he has imitations in the pasing game.
With the line we have it would look just like a pre-season game.Or both. I would start Wolford, but have a few packages for Perkins to use his skills etc. The Cards would be caught off guard a bit and that adds a dimension of explosion to the offense. And this doesnt put too much on Perkins because he has imitations in the pasing game.
Fuck you, Bobby.
"Yeah, you know" ~ Super Bowl 56In the long run you might have a good argument.
You never know at this point.
Yeah, and there were some that posted the same about that David Edwards wasn't playing well at LG and that Bobby Evans playing there could be an upgrade.Stafford isn't playing well, at all. This could be interesting to see a different QB. Rams are doing nothing this year so this could be a good thing.