- Joined
- Aug 15, 2014
- Messages
- 5,959
View: https://twitter.com/line_mitch/status/1568075532633260036?t=waG5LoRrAZtGYlcza3zETg&s=19
It's the same issue he had with Woods.
How do we know though ? How many times did Stafford hold onto the ball because Kupp was his only read? Many things went wrong. Anything could've helped. Like sustaining drives and not targeting Kupp like he's the only guy out there.I don't disagree but that particular problem is pretty far down the list of shit to fix.
Almost never. But the score was 10-10 at halftime. The game was in reach. And we could've kept the defense off the field with sustained drives. You don't sustain drives by locking onto one guy all night.Seriously though, when your QB gets sacked 7 times and your defense can't force the other team to punt, how often do you win those games?
Because you put the cart in front of the horse. Protections always come first.How do we know though ? How many times did Stafford hold onto the ball because Kupp was his only read? Many things went wrong. Anything could've helped. Like sustaining drives and not targeting Kupp like he's the only guy out there.
Exactly. 3-4 of those sacks were Stafford holding the ball to long and not going through his progressions. Robinson was beating his guy like a drum today and you can't convince me Stafford didn't see that when he went to the sideline and looked at the tablet. He choose to not look his way. Completely inexcusable from a 13 year vet.How do we know though ? How many times did Stafford hold onto the ball because Kupp was his only read? Many things went wrong. Anything could've helped. Like sustaining drives and not targeting Kupp like he's the only guy out there.
And if the protection is bad, make the reads quicker. We should know this. Teams do it to us all the time. You can't stare down one guy and wait for him to get open.Because you put the cart in front of the horse. Protections always come first.
Someone mentioned a play where Robinson broke free on a slant and Stafford looked right at him and scrambled instead. Now maybe he saw something they didn't (defender coming up lay him out maybe?) But as you said it was there all night.Exactly. 3-4 of those sacks were Stafford holding the ball to long and not going through his progressions. Robinson was beating his guy like a drum today and you can't convince me Stafford didn't see that when he went to the sideline and looked at the tablet. He choose to not look his way. Completely inexcusable from a 13 year vet.
I don't wanna be too negative after game one but Woods cleared the air about this same thing last season.Agreed it was painful to see like 0 effort to get your 2nd biggest weapon involved. In the 4th quarter during the last few drives how does McVay not tell Stafford to get something throw towards Robinson? why not force it to him when it was over already anyway? Seemed odd
View: https://twitter.com/line_mitch/status/1568075532633260036?t=waG5LoRrAZtGYlcza3zETg&s=19
It's the same issue he had with Woods.
Yes we do know it. McVay knows it. Stafford knows it. Coen knows it. The mailman knows it. It's just gonna take a back seat to sorting those protections.And if the protection is bad, make the reads quicker. We should know this. Teams do it to us all the time. You can't stare down one guy and wait for him to get open.
I got up at 4 am to watch this shit show. Just after 5 am I set off the smoke detector burning some toast and waking the wife and hounds.Almost never. But the score was 10-10 at halftime. The game was in reach. And we could've kept the defense off the field with sustained drives. You don't sustain drives by locking onto one guy all night.