Questioning McSnead last year wasn't an option. You were either backing them and anything they did or you were treated like crap around here and had your fandom questioned. Now after winning a Super Bowl it seems ok to question him. This timeline seems flawed to me
There were plenty of folks questioning McVay during the winless month.
Questioning what people are doing in leadership positions is healthy and really needed no matter the position.
They don't (and probably shouldn't) give the reasons behind certain moves.
The most bizarre to me was trading Woods....that move made zero sense.
But, like I said, it would be very interesting to be a fly on the wall in those discussions with the brain trust.
The results so far have been great and provide them with a lot of lee way in my book.....not freedom from being questioned, but, leeway to do what they feel they need to do.
It will be interesting to see, if McVay sticks it out long term, does he become a consistent contending coach.....like a Andy Reid type, or does he morph into a so-so underachieving guy like Tomlin. Will be interesting to see and I hope he sticks around for quite some time and doesn't follow the path of his mentor, Gruden.
Over emotional swings are common with fan bases.
A coach wins 4 games in a row and he's the greatest since Lombardi....he loses 4 in a row and he's a bum who should immediately be fired.
No matter what, the choices that surprises are made are made for reason usually not revealed to fan bases.
The fans have a right to question moves, it's healthy.
The Rams willingness to cut bait on so many of their recent draft picks is surprising but healthy in a way too. They are going to do what they feel the need to do to make the team better.