Perhaps for you, because it matches stuff you've said in the past.Think the conversation is being had more so because of the injuries. Thinking old man Adams and physical as hell Puka wouldn't get hurt at all is questionable. Everyone wants to say all in or future when in all honesty part of wanting that depth plays into the future as well since the Rams would also have time to groom a WR with some more athletic traits and ability. Would it have worked? Well who knows.....all these conversations are hypothetical honestly.... anywho, hope our injured players come back sooner than later and we go on a run
But the original poster of this thread had already stated in the Puka thread:
If the were 5-2 with the same injury situation, yep.. I wouldn’t be complaining.
Anyway, all through this thread we've seen generalities of what approach the Rams could or should have been done as if teams draft (or trade for) positions and not players AND (more importantly) as if the player acquisition process ended on draft day.
Last edited: