OLD THREAD-Trade (speculation) Matt Stafford

[1maGoh]

2 things.

1. I keep thinking this thread is titled "Trade for Saffold?" and every time I think, hell yeah get Saffold back! Every time I'm disappointed.

2. @jrry32 you'll never convince me McVay is smarter than Jim Bob Footer!

 

[Malibu]

No a lateral to downgrade move. What has he 2on nothing!

 

[OldSchool]

Stafford is a decent QB....










for your fantasy team.

 

[Gandalf]

Stafford is a decent QB....










for your fantasy team.

Not really, he puts up a lot of duds.

 

[MadGoat]

View: https://twitter.com/VincentFrankNFL/status/1355092390671863808



View: https://twitter.com/VincentFrankNFL/status/1355096371565457412

 

[Liberator]

View: https://twitter.com/JFowlerESPN/status/1355280011549437955

 

[Mackeyser]

That may have been what Dan Orlovsky tweeted about and deleted

 

[Memento]

View: https://twitter.com/VincentFrankNFL/status/1355092390671863808



View: https://twitter.com/VincentFrankNFL/status/1355096371565457412

I hope they do it, I really do. Stafford's an upgrade over Garappolo, but not that much - and I'd love to see them with less picks.

 

[Liberator]

Stafford would be a HUGE upgrade on Goff. Totally different levels of QB play.

 

[Memento]

Stafford would be a HUGE upgrade on Goff. Totally different levels of QB play.

Not really. Jerry explained it better than I could.

 

[dieterbrock]

Stafford would be a HUGE upgrade on Goff. Totally different levels of QB play.

 

[Ram_Rally]

View: https://twitter.com/JFowlerESPN/status/1355280011549437955

We'd be a contender.

 

[MadGoat]

Not really. Jerry explained it better than I could.

Stafford might be a little better, possibly a little worse. Either way, not worth giving up picks and dealing with the cap implications of trying to deal Goff. Also, good luck getting any leverage if he isn't traded before adding another QB.

 

[Ram_Rally]

Stafford might be a little better, possibly a little worse. Either way, not worth giving up picks and dealing with the cap implications of trying to deal Goff. Also, good luck getting any leverage if he isn't traded before adding another QB.

Damn. Good points.

 

[payote75]

I like Stafford I think he is really good and never gotten the benefits of having all of it roll at once but I'd rather he go to the niners. If we get Stafford and the niners get Watson I will cry.
And if mcvay is all about the mobility then he must really hate Goff all the sudden. Last I checked Stafford very good but still not a creator. So it's a big contradiction if that's true.

 

[Merlin]

Let the 9ers overpay for Stafford. No way I give those clowns a ton of draft capital for that dude. I'm actually worried now that we're gonna pull this off.

 

[Mackeyser]

Let the 9ers overpay for Stafford. No way I give those clowns a ton of draft capital for that dude. I'm actually worried now that we're gonna pull this off.

 

[iamme33]

i think if goff will go to that camp that the qb guru puts on and we bring in some competition(not stafford he cost to much) i think goff will be fine.

 

[Liberator]

Let the 9ers overpay for Stafford. No way I give those clowns a ton of draft capital for that dude. I'm actually worried now that we're gonna pull this off.

Let your biggest rival improve their only glaring weakness is a bold strategy I must say haha. Idk man I think Stafford is significantly better then Jimmy G or Goff, but I guess we may agree to disagree.

 

[payote75]

The rams/lions leaking this to up the price but also have the whiners commit get Stafford and keep Watson away. Man this becoming an obsession lolol I hope it's resolved soon. Geezez