Michael Brockers rejoins Rams after deal with Ravens falls through

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
alp said:
www.espn.com

Brockers rejoins Rams after failed Ravens deal

After a deal with the Ravens fell through over concerns about his injured left ankle, defensive lineman Michael Brockers is returning to the Rams on a three-year deal, Brockers' agent confirmed to ESPN.
www.espn.com www.espn.com
Click to expand...
Deal is similar to what Ravens offered. What changed?

Fantasy Sports

Find all the latest Rotoworld fantasy sports news, live coverage, videos, highlights, stats, predictions, and results right here on NBC Sports.
www.rotoworld.com www.rotoworld.com
 
To quote Mr Burns....Excellent.
The addition of Robinson should allow Brockers to play his most natural position.
Also, this gives the Rams a real and true shot at a very good DL rotation.
Donald, Brockers, Day, Robinson, Gaines a draft pick. Should be very very solid.
Still using a draft pick on the DL for a rusher but maybe not the 2nd round pick now.
 
  • 8Like
  • Cheers
  • High Five
Reactions: FarNorth, Dodgersrf, Liberator and 7 others
So...we signed 2 FAs AND Brockers but we couldn't re-sign fowler or littleton?

If we can somebody to step up on the edge, this defense could work out, though.
 
I'm not so sure about this one. Now, the Robinson signing will cost us the Littleton comp pick. But the Rams clearly think he's worth the price. And if they're bringing him back with Robinson here, they must be planning on Robinson playing NT.
 
  • Like
  • Cheers
Reactions: RamsFlash80, BonifayRam and fearsomefour
Dude will need to step up his production he was missing a lot in games last year .. that said glad to have big brock back
 
  • Like
Reactions: RamsFlash80 and IBruce80
I wonder how much incentives make it up. Because all things equal, we're giving him more money than the Ravens were gonna give him after a failed physical.
 
fanotodd said:
So...we signed 2 FAs AND Brockers but we couldn't re-sign fowler or littleton?

If we can somebody to step up on the edge, this defense could work out, though.
Click to expand...

Fowler wanted to be paid like a fairly big star, after one good but not great season. Littleton's quite good in the right system. Weak against the run though, and the Rams needed to improve there.

Plus, as others have alluded, the Rams needed more than one position. Especially with all the other top of the market players they have, they needed to get less expensive quality players. Hopefully they chose the right ones. I do wish they could have done a bit harder bargaining with Brockers, but I wasn't on the conference call.
 
  • 4Like
  • Cheers
Reactions: norcalramfan, Loyal, fearsomefour and 2 others
There's probably a lot that we don't know. We don't know these guys personally.

But ugh....this is basically the same amount for Littleton, who is younger and plays at a position of bigger need for us right now.
 
  • Like
  • Thread Winner
Reactions: RamsFlash80, RamsFanCK and fearsomefour
They had money for this? Also lose a comp pick. They’re looking at one pick now given they lost Fowler and Littleton and signed Robinson. D line no longer a huge draft need. Focus on ILB and O line
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back