I am pretty new to this forum stuff so thanks oh wise one.I don't understand why responding to your comparison of McVay to Switzer would be weird in any way.
It's a forum.. you posted a take, I reacted to that take.. it's, literally, what happens here.
I'm certainly credible on this subject. "But he signed a contract" is a nonsense argument for a coach considering walking away from coaching. We retain the rights to the contract. If he comes back, the contract is still in place. The contract does not prevent him from leaving coaching. And his leaving coaching does not deprive the team of its rights under the contract.From the opposite spectrum, it's also the same contract where teams terminate players and coaches when they don't perform the services within. I'm not sure you're a credible source for a weak argument either @jrry32.
Misfire.I'm not sure why you're arguing this point with me.
I'm sorry, I'm just not up to the semantics here.I am pretty new to this forum stuff so thanks oh wise one.
You literally took what I said, purposely took it out of context and put words I did not use in my mouth.
The context was legacy. Not success.
But thanks for the schooling brother.
Because of the obsession with draft picks. No one will ever mention the contributions from Jalen Ramsey and Matthew Stafford, or mention that the 2019 1st rounder was #31 and traded down, or that in 2017 the trade up for Jared Goff was worth it.
I looked back at the 2018 - 2022 drafts in the precious first round and found only one guy I would actually want from where the Rams' pick would've been, and that's Justin Jefferson. Everyone else IDGAF.
Also the problem with 2006 - 2011 was no stable ownership or competent management. 2012-2016 got better on that front so the team became at least NFL ready. Now ownership is stable, a good GM in place, and a good group of core players (that aren't suddenly gonna fall off a cliff). I'm not worried on that front.
Yea I'm sorry definitely can't agree here @Kupped is 1000 percent correct. We all know the real world is much different than the sports world. It creates a ton of instability as well as good luck getting and or recruiting players to sign here veterans etc. and especially at a discount price nobody wants to go to a dysfunctional situation and that's what an interim coach would create. It rocks the very foundation we have built since mcvays arrival to the core. Being a cpa on Jones finklestein and Myers and leaving and coming back is a lot different that coaching leading men crazy highs lows schemes influence and the list goes on. He has to be either in or out but if out in 3 years should he be replenished refreshed then that's different but in the meantime the new coach has to be treated as such not interim.Instability isn't caused by introducing an interim title if a winning culture and systems are already established. There are many examples in the non football world where people leave for a year and return to there jobs such as maternity/paternity leave or mental leave and everything is fine upon return because the company can keep things running smoothly.
This is pretty much my response to your post @payote75 . Thanks for typing faster than me @XXXIVwin and I agree with you completely on this.Rams like to buck conventional wisdom. "F them picks," for example.
Right now, if I had to guess, I'd predict that the Rams and McVay decide upon an unconventional agreement that's never been tried before: an understanding that McVay takes a year off and then returns in 2024.
Hell, I'm just speculating (like everyone else), but that's my guess for now.
From the Rams perspective: they get to keep an exceptionally talented coach long-term.
From McVay's perspective: he gets to take a full year away from the game to get his head right.
The downside: An "interim" coach for a year is gonna be really hard for the coaches and players... how will they be able to go "all-in" for 2023?
I don't know what will happen of course, but I could definitely imagine a scenario where management and McVay make a "handshake agreement" along these lines. It would be weird and unprecedented and full of risk, but I nevertheless think it's very possible.
I just don't see how the Rams benefit from such an arrangement. Instead of pursuing the top candidates available to succeed McVay, the Rams elect to stay in a holding pattern for 2023.I don't know what will happen of course, but I could definitely imagine a scenario where management and McVay make a "handshake agreement" along these lines. It would be weird and unprecedented and full of risk, but I nevertheless think it's very possible.
If he should return before the end of the 2026 season the new team would have to compensate us similar to the Saints this year with asshole face.I will just observe that Schrager's suggestion he may take a break then return in a couple years is not how it works. If he needs a break that means his time as head coach is over with us. When he returns, if he does, there is no telling where he'll end up.
Also he knows he has tough calls to make with this staff. So leaving it open for them to take jobs is a good way to let certain problems solve themselves. One less guy he has to axe is a lot of saved stress.
If nothing else, this team is interesting.
And by interesting, I mean a drama/comedy/horror movie. Does that even exist?? What in the actual fuck is going on here?
Stick around somebody is going to get screwed.I prefer porn to what is going on here.
What a terrible take. Talk about comparing apples to a polar bearYou must really dislike Kurt Warner, Isaac Bruce, Torry Holt, Marshall Faulk, and Andrew Whitworth. You're going to eventually dislike Aaron Donald. Every single one of these guys are "quitters" (or in Donald's case will be). They all quit football and walked away from the game. Hell, odds are you've "quit" a job during your life. If not, you're the exception.
Yes that's the beauty of having him under contract. I like that he can't just go somewhere else without us getting compensation.If he should return before the end of the 2026 season the new team would have to compensate us similar to the Saints this year with asshole face.