Or groin?Bryant probably replaces Mo Alexander who was not practicing due to hamstring.
@DR RAM
Link?I'm guessing that McGee wasn't 100%, and we moved on. I do feel sorry for him, because I read his comments yesterday.
Or groin?Bryant probably replaces Mo Alexander who was not practicing due to hamstring.
Link?I'm guessing that McGee wasn't 100%, and we moved on. I do feel sorry for him, because I read his comments yesterday.
I'm on the same boat as everyone else. Love what Bryant can bring, and stoked Quicky is coming back. Hopefully we see him make a few plays.
“I woke (Tuesday) to a call from my agent,” said McGee, a fifth-round pick by the Rams in 2013 out of Miami (Fla.). “That was pretty cool, I wasn’t expecting that at all, honestly. It’s a blessing to be here, and be back in a position where you’re able to help the team.”
My thoughts exactly. Throw on 1st down. Everyone is expecting the Rams to run run run. Setup the run with the pass. Like you say, they have the horses. I'd like to see 5 wideouts with Tavon in the backfield.It is the other way around. just too much world class talent in receiving on this team now. Who are you going to cover: Quick? Britt? Austin? Cook? Kendricks? Bailey? Givens?
Pass to setup the run. Nick Foles will throw for 35 times this game. That will open up the running lanes for the best offensive player in this draft Gurley.
I am expecting a 59-0 Rams win. Truth.
+1I can't wait to have Quick's blocking ability out there on the edges.
Nobody will ever best Tom Baker for me, but Tennant was great. Also really enjoying Peter Capaldi, but I liked him in The Thick Of It, too.
Ponder this for a moment. All these moves have been to set up the plan all along. Fisher and Co. knew coming into the season that there O was going to look very different once Gurley came back . He also knew it probably prudent to give Quick some extra time after his severe injury to both heal and overcome it psychologically. On top of that, he knew he had an OL that needed some time to gel and mature. So, he game plans all off season for the opener against Seattle and we see the successful results. But that leaves his team a little vulnerable in week 2 on the road and we see that result. Week 3 was time to test Gurley but not too much and to give Quick that one more week of rest. He was probably banking on stealing a win there at home but had a bigger picture in mind.
We all know what Fisher and Snead have been trying to do is build this team to win in the division first. Knowing, in the long run, that winning in what was the toughest division at the time in football would surely spill over to winning overall. Maybe just maybe we are fixing to see our real O for the first time this week in Arizona. Could it be part of the reason Quick has been held back is the fact Fisher didn't want to show the true nature of his game plan until now? Wouldn't a win this week loom much larger than a win in one of the previous two weeks? I'm not saying Fisher and the Rams didn't try to win the last two games but I'm thinking he may have rolled the dice with a bigger picture in mind. Honestly, I think Fisher figured he didn't need Gurley or Quick to beat Washington. And I think at home against Pittsburgh, he put it all on his D to win the game thinking the O could do just enough to maybe squeak out the win.
Ponder this for a moment. All these moves have been to set up the plan all along. Fisher and Co. knew coming into the season that there O was going to look very different once Gurley came back . He also knew it probably prudent to give Quick some extra time after his severe injury to both heal and overcome it psychologically. On top of that, he knew he had an OL that needed some time to gel and mature. So, he game plans all off season for the opener against Seattle and we see the successful results. But that leaves his team a little vulnerable in week 2 on the road and we see that result. Week 3 was time to test Gurley but not too much and to give Quick that one more week of rest. He was probably banking on stealing a win there at home but had a bigger picture in mind.
We all know what Fisher and Snead have been trying to do is build this team to win in the division first. Knowing, in the long run, that winning in what was the toughest division at the time in football would surely spill over to winning overall. Maybe just maybe we are fixing to see our real O for the first time this week in Arizona. Could it be part of the reason Quick has been held back is the fact Fisher didn't want to show the true nature of his game plan until now? Wouldn't a win this week loom much larger than a win in one of the previous two weeks? I'm not saying Fisher and the Rams didn't try to win the last two games but I'm thinking he may have rolled the dice with a bigger picture in mind. Honestly, I think Fisher figured he didn't need Gurley or Quick to beat Washington. And I think at home against Pittsburgh, he put it all on his D to win the game thinking the O could do just enough to maybe squeak out the win.