Why not both?
Bortles likely signs a short term deal 1/2 year deal. Gordon (or any 5th-7th round drafted QB) could end up on PS
how many QB’s can they keep. Gordon might even be a udfa. So then no problem I guess ?
Why not both?
Bortles likely signs a short term deal 1/2 year deal. Gordon (or any 5th-7th round drafted QB) could end up on PS
Keep 2 on the roster and 1 on PS, you're totally right that he could be a UDFA, which is why I added the 5th to 7th rounder. I feel like McVay is going to draft a QB one of these years...how many QB’s can they keep. Gordon might even be a udfa. So then no problem I guess ?
Keep 2 on the roster and 1 on PS, you're totally right that he could be a UDFA, which is why I added the 5th to 7th rounder. I feel like McVay is going to draft a QB one of these years...
A half year for Bortles sounds great!Why not both?
Bortles likely signs a short term deal 1/2 year deal. Gordon (or any 5th-7th round drafted QB) could end up on PS
A half year for Bortles sounds great!
I feel like in today's NFL the best use of a QB2 spot is development.Why not both?
Bortles likely signs a short term deal 1/2 year deal. Gordon (or any 5th-7th round drafted QB) could end up on PS
Seems that the "development" QB role in today's NFL is the one on the PS.I feel like in today's NFL the best use of a QB2 spot is development.
Yep that's how it is now. My point was I think that's going to change. Particularly when you have an astute offensive staff, which I think we do.Seems that the "development" QB role in today's NFL is the one on the PS.
The #2 (on teams with a true #1) is cheap vet. I agree there is little reason to spend big $$ on back up QB unless you either have doubt in your QB (Rams dont) or have injury concerns (again Rams dont)
And while I agree the season is pretty much lost if the #1 goes down, you still need a QB that is capable of running an NFL offense. A late round draft pick cant automatically take that #2 spot. Either you carry 3 QB (No thanks) or you get the kid on PS