Dotson and a contract

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,036
This is why I've been saying that they may have to cut Havenstein and Noteboom if they want to pay Dotson. Cutting Havenstein and Noteboom as post June 1 transactions would give them about $21M in cap space.
Which is completely false, because you don’t know what you are talking about.
Cutting them with a post June 1 does NOT give them the cap space UNTIL June 1.

they might have re-signed Bruss to look at as an OT this year in OTAs and TC, He was signed as an OT not OG this year
Also false, he is not signed to a contract he is signed to a futures deal which basically gives him an invite to TC as 1 of 90. Unless thru draft/fa they don’t need him and they’ll rescind.
If they had any serious interest, they’d sign him to a non guaranteed contract at league minimum. Which they didn’t
 

Ramhusker

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
14,462
Name
Bo Bowen
When the dust settles, I sure as hell hope that at least, Shelton or Dotson are still in horns. Hate to lose either but this line's continuity won't suffer as much replacing just one starter. Good thing is, in my eyes, this is a good draft for OL. so either could be replaced with upside players. But, do you want to put Stafford behind two rookies in the middle? And do you want to use all your early draft capital on the OL? I don't won't to do either!
 

Ramhusker

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
14,462
Name
Bo Bowen
No because the decision on Boom pretty much needs to be made before free agency even starts.
Yeah, that's probably the next concrete news we get to our direction. Sucks that Boom is quite the asset when he gets to play but can't stop getting dinged up. But the good thing is when he gets dinged up, he usually doesn't stay out very long. Can we get him some kind of rubber coated chainmail to wear?
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,036
Yeah, that's probably the next concrete news we get to our direction. Sucks that Boom is quite the asset when he gets to play but can't stop getting dinged up. But the good thing is when he gets dinged up, he usually doesn't stay out very long. Can we get him some kind of rubber coated chainmail to wear?
The thing is how the market would view him if he was a free agent.
If a team sees him as a starting OT, he would get a deal like what he has/had with the Rams.
However if he is only viewed as a backup/swing he’s looking at half of that.
 

Ramhusker

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
14,462
Name
Bo Bowen
The thing is how the market would view him if he was a free agent.
If a team sees him as a starting OT, he would get a deal like what he has/had with the Rams.
However if he is only viewed as a backup/swing he’s looking at half of that.
I know this has probably already been discussed, but what is the cap ramifications if you could trade Boom? Any chance of getting somebody with a lot of cap to eat a little on Boom?
 

PARAM

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
4,360
This kind of thinking lends itself to a ton of flexibility for the Rams and potentially a better Oline in the future. Drafting one of the top tackles after losing Dotson is a good consolation prize... which may turn into 1st prize at the state fair after a year or two.

FWIW, we need to draft a tackle this year no matter what with Havenstein's contract nearing it's end, Jackson probably needing to be paid in a year and losing our top swing tackle.

I don't think people realize how high tackle probably is on the Rams needs list.
I hope they draft both LT and C. And figure a way to reduce JNs cap hit. If we are going to have either a rookie center and/or LT, it would be nice to have experienced depth. The injury concerns will always be there even if he went 3 yrs without one. (Oddly enough when I typed that last sentence it said "hrs", not "yrs" :wow2: ). But innuries could hit anyone.

Is Shelton going to get blown away with an outside offer? Maybe. Maybe not. We'll know going into the draft about our 3 OL FAs. Depending on what happens, maybe best case scenario is draft the LT (though that C looks impressive). Trade up?
I'd encourage you to read Thinking In Bets which Snead has incorporated into the Rams scouting and front office decision making process to get a sense of whether what I'm saying provides accuracy or not and the inherent value at play.

It's a safe bet to assume that Snead has used the same logic (though the data he has is greater than anything I have) to put value to Bruss's future contributions. I'd call it 70/30.

(Though, I imagine his percentages could be different than mine.)
What's the percengage on a mediocre OL protecting Stafford from injury for 17 games?
 
Last edited:

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,036
I know this has probably already been discussed, but what is the cap ramifications if you could trade Boom? Any chance of getting somebody with a lot of cap to eat a little on Boom?
Same as if they cut him.
Dead cap hit of 15 mill + his 5 mill roster bonus unless he’s traded before 3/18
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,036
I don't think he needs encouragement. I think he eats, sleeps, and dreams Havenstein getting cut. :dizzy:
Would make sense too right? Being that McVay is talking continuity and all, it would mean that despite his OC a UFA, his RT a RFA and his RG a UFA that he’d obviously cut his LT
 

HitStick

Van Jefferson’s #1 fan
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
2,567
If we can’t resign him, Guard becomes our biggest need. The difference in production after he took over is proof that we need a dominant line.

Doctson is my number 1 free agency must. If he signs elsewhere, sign a cb and edge, draft o line
 

Ram Ts

Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 23, 2020
Messages
2,263
What we don’t know is what the Rams think of Dotson (& Shelton) and their values. Maybe they don’t think as highly of Dotson and feel he was a product of their OL coaching and system. Maybe they do love him but his salary demand is crazy and they want him to realize that via FA. Maybe they feel better options all things considered. It could be any of those or even a combination. We’re using 5-25% knowledge at best (as we usually do lol).
 

Ram_Rally

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
5,957
What we don’t know is what the Rams think of Dotson (& Shelton) and their values. Maybe they don’t think as highly of Dotson and feel he was a product of their OL coaching and system. Maybe they do love him but his salary demand is crazy and they want him to realize that via FA. Maybe they feel better options all things considered. It could be any of those or even a combination. We’re using 5-25% knowledge at best (as we usually do lol).
I think they think of interior offensive line what most of us think about running backs. Sign them if the value is there. This could be the third good guard they've met walk under Mcvay which says they don't overly value it to me.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
40,566
Pretty sure the terms are what I posted.
Los Angeles on Sunday announced it has traded its 2024 fourth-round draft pick and its 2025 fifth-round draft pick to the Pittsburgh Steelers in exchange for offensive lineman Kevin Dotson, the Steelers' 2024 fifth-round draft pick, and the Steelers' 2025 sixth-round draft pick.

Quote from an article after the trade
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
6,995
Name
Scott
I have a hard time believing they will commit $18M apy for an OG.
 
Last edited: