Coleman Shelton

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

snackdaddy

Who's your snackdaddy?
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
15,398
ROD Credit 2025
47,481
Name
Charlie
I notice quite a few fans don't seem to like Shelton as our center. Not sure why. Now I'm certainly not any kind of lineman evaluator. I look at the line as a whole. Over the course of a game. Over the course of a season. What I saw was a very good offensive line. 5 guys in sync with each other. And Coleman was one fifth of that equation.

If Coleman is the weak link as some would say, why did McVay want him? My guess is stability. Coleman may not be a road grader. Might get pushed back in the pocket by bigger lineman. But whatever he's doing he's getting the job done over 17 games. He's another quarterback who sees things the other guys may not see. Don't be surprised if they bring him back next year. He won't cost much.
 
He’s not a dominant center, however, getting him back in the lineup made an immediate improvement and he’s probably a huge reason Stafford was able to stay clean. There will always be a player that’s under appreciated for no reason: it’s just Sheltons turn right now.
 
I notice quite a few fans don't seem to like Shelton as our center. Not sure why. Now I'm certainly not any kind of lineman evaluator. I look at the line as a whole. Over the course of a game. Over the course of a season. What I saw was a very good offensive line. 5 guys in sync with each other. And Coleman was one fifth of that equation.

If Coleman is the weak link as some would say, why did McVay want him? My guess is stability. Coleman may not be a road grader. Might get pushed back in the pocket by bigger lineman. But whatever he's doing he's getting the job done over 17 games. He's another quarterback who sees things the other guys may not see. Don't be surprised if they bring him back next year. He won't cost much.
If interested, there is a thread on page 39 of the Rams / NFL Talk ROD forum.

It's from March 10, 2025, and it's titled "Coleman Shelton Signs with Rams". It's 17 pages, with 322 replies.

Lets you know how many posters felt at the time the Rams brought Shelton back.
 
His calls made the line better. No doubt about it. He's good enough in the eyes of McVay and his staff, which is what matters here as well.

But I'm among those who would like a better Center.
 
I think it's consensus that he is not the most physical center - certainly not as strong as his young back-up that he replaced. But he is smart and I'm guessing gives us another set of knowing eyes on offense. He makes the entire line better and gives Staff a pre-snap hint as to what may be coming.
 
I think it's consensus that he is not the most physical center - certainly not as strong as his young back-up that he replaced. But he is smart and I'm guessing gives us another set of knowing eyes on offense. He makes the entire line better and gives Staff a pre-snap hint as to what may be coming.
His above-the-neck makes him above average. I'm guessing by now he knows exactly what McVay and Stafford need everybody to know up front in every situation.
 
620 drop backs; 23 sacks. That's a percentage of 3.7%. Not too shabby. Shelton is the guy who makes the calls and gives everybody their assignment. 3.7% or 1.4 sacks per game. Better than not too shabby, IMHO. 465 rushing attempts and a 4.6 avg. along with 17 TDs and 126 first downs. #1 Offense in 2025. Well, I guess if we gotta point to somebody in a negative manner, might as well be the under valued Coleman Shelton! There are some fans who want (and even sometimes expect) an All Pro at every position (I exaggerate of course but you get the point).
 
His calls made the line better. No doubt about it. He's good enough in the eyes of McVay and his staff, which is what matters here as well.

But I'm among those who would like a better Center.


What does "better" mean for a center in our offense? He gets some credit for the overall performance, and the tricky thing is, we don't really know how good a center is from the mental aspect. We can more easily see coverage busts without knowing the play call from the secondary than we can know exactly what benefit Shelton brings from the mental aspect.

My perspective is, he may not be the best individual blocker, but he clearly makes the rest of the offensive line better, which means there are very few centers I would trade him for given how good our line was last year.
 
Wasn't it mentioned that Stafford was comfortable with Shelton because it took pressure off him on line calls? I'll go with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PARAM and RamFan503
What does "better" mean for a center in our offense?
"Better" in my book would be a Center who doesn't need to be protected by the OGs next to him. Who doesn't require help vs a strong NT.

Of course the metric that matters most is can we win a title with him anchoring our line. I'd say that is probably a yes, if this team stays healthy at key positions. We won the last one with Allen at Center after all. But time will tell.
 
The one position on the offense I think should be upgraded and it shouldn't be hard. He's not bad but he's not good just a JAG imo. Maybe next year we pick my draft crush at 32 :D
 
Shelton probably doesn't get the cred he deserves. The QB and Center have to be operating at an ESP level of communication especially in hostile stadiums on the road. We are lucky to have Shelton.