Both Faulk and Holt get to "yakkity-yaking"...they were both great players, and should make the HOF...however they are not great analyst yet because their not being real. You analyze objectively...so they're actually showing how much growth remains for them as analyst. You don;t analyze as a great player...you analyze from a football perspective.
If a player misses a block...show that, and speak to what they could have done to be better!
Even the HOF-ers made a few errors. Where were those two in the Super Bowl against the Pats??? Why couldn't they over come all the holding???
So the point is analyze...don't always criticize!!!