- Joined
- Jun 20, 2014
- Messages
- 562
Agreed. mcVay had had 6 years to find a decent back up QB which he has completely failed at.
I think our team is just that much worse this year.What I don’t understand is Wolford looked competent that year he took over for Goff ( I mean he had limitations obviously but he got things rolling some ) but I just can’t understand after all this time how he’s regressed so bad?
I think you all are focusing on a minor consideration for McVay.
I think McVay's main focus for back up QB's is to lead a scout offense, imitating upcoming opponents. I think that's why Wolfy and Perkins are here, because they offer different type QB styles for our defense to go against. They may be good imitators and McVay likes that. Before this year, most of us would have said losing Stafford means sure losses anyway and maybe McVay feels the same way, so why not have back up QB's that can help them win during most of the year. I know that right now with Stafford injured our focus shifts toward incompetent game day back ups. IF we spend our 2nd round pick next year on a back up QB, that will be a lost year too, imo. We need help on the Oline more than anything, to help Stafford stay upright....
My recollection is that Perkins often had a knack for making spectacular 5 to 10 yard runs, sometimes in clutch situations. But it sure seemed like he never REALLY got the offense rolling... We'd score 10 or maybe 17 points, but never more than that.In preseason he always seemed to make things happen even with his limitations.
With a limited window with Stafford, Donald, Kupp, Ramsey, I go with option C. If memory serves, Hurts didn't do squat in the first two years, for whatever reason. We don't have more than two years with this core group, so get players that can maximize what we have.Well , funny question. Who would you rather have ? Jalen Hurts or Cam Akers.
I thought Hurts would have fell to The Rams could have had Jalen Hurts who went right after Cam Akers. Johnathan Taylor was my pick & The Rams could have traded up to get him.
#41 for #52 & #58.
In McSnead we trust....Wolford never to me looked like a good QB. I saw a tweet yesterday and had to go back and watch the game to see and the guy was right for the most part. Wolford almost jumps into a throw and struggles to get any kind of zip on the ball.
Never said otherwise. Even trusting them I don't think he's somebody we want to rely on to win games.In McSnead we trust....
YOUSONOFA!!!! ~ SneadNever said otherwise. Even trusting them I don't think he's somebody we want to rely on to win games.
He started 2 games and finished 1. The one he finished, he drove the offense to 4 FGs (but at least we won). The other one (in the p.s.) he was knocked out very early. We won that game also. But he has never looked like an NFL caliber backup to these eyes. Like many have suggested, McVay must see himself in Wolford but it's time he admitted that guy wasn't an NFL caliber QB either. Maybe Wolford will end up being a good coach!What I don’t understand is Wolford looked competent that year he took over for Goff ( I mean he had limitations obviously but he got things rolling some ) but I just can’t understand after all this time how he’s regressed so bad?
Has he just been collecting paychecks and doing just just enough to get by where he can stay on the team?
I don’t even know what to say honestly.
P.s. on the subject of Looking for a quality back up QB this upcoming draft is the one to do it in. Going to be interesting if we get one with all the other crazy holes we have now.
Any idea who?We need to draft a QB who can be a backup and has developmental potential for the post-Stafford world.