I just addressed this, but I'll do it again using your example.
Is it hard to say, "Schotty is the most uncreative OC I've ever seen, and I wouldn't be heartbroken if he was canned."? As opposed to, "Schotty is complete crap and needs to be fired."? Because the issue is that everyone's opinion is gospel (you know, to them). So when you (or I, or anyone) states an opinion in absolutes while bashing the team, its coaches or the Organization, then you're putting people on the defensive. As PhxRam said a couple of days ago, I signed up with an account and was VERY critical of Bradford for the whole day and nobody was offended by anything I said. In fact, a few posters tried to give me examples of why I might be overreacting and laid out some very nice arguments FOR Bradford.
Now how much would you like to wager that you all would have 'inappropriated' me off the board if I came in swinging? What if I came in with that account and said things like, "Bradord sucks. Biggest bust ever. Can't take a hit, can't read defenses, pouts like a girl, can't move around, stares at receivers like there's no one else on the field, and is generally the biggest waste of money this Organization ever had the misfortune of drafting."? Those are the exact opinions I gave, but I used my words. I didn't use my emotions. I used my words.
All we're asking is that you discuss this team like you're discussing it WITH the team.