Any Trade Ideas/Thoughts Concerning The Rams Before The Trade Deadline?

[Allen2McVay]

It'd make too much sense for the Rams to do this.

There are some ugly off-field issues (legal charges and accusations) from his past that warrant consideration.

 

[den-the-coach]

There are some ugly off-field issues (legal charges and accusations) from his past that warrant consideration.

IDK, the guy sure can rush the passer.

Clark's suspension stems from him pleading no contest in September to two counts of misdemeanor possession of an assault weapon in separate incidents in 2021. Clark was sentenced to one year of probation and 40 hours of community service.

 

[snackdaddy]

It’s not always about this year. A Burns or a Claypool is not a one year rental type of transaction (like Miller was). That’s about solidifying the edge for years. Either one of those paired with young would give Oline fits, add in Donald and they’d have nightmares

Oh, I'm fine with signing a legit edge rusher to a multi year deal. That makes sense. Its for the future. I just don't want to give up a day 2 pick for a half year rental. The Miller situation was different. We had a contending roster and his addition put us over the top. It was worth it. Burns would be worth it if they signed him to an extension.

 

[Ramhusker]

IDK, the guy sure can rush the passer.

Clark's suspension stems from him pleading no contest in September to two counts of misdemeanor possession of an assault weapon in separate incidents in 2021. Clark was sentenced to one year of probation and 40 hours of community service.

Assault weapon? Where did he get one of those? You can’t buy one in a store.

 

[den-the-coach]

Assault weapon? Where did he get one of those? You can’t buy one in a store.

It's not from the Boy Scouts, I assure you.

 

[jrry32]

Assault weapon? Where did he get one of those? You can’t buy one in a store.

Yes, you can.

There are some ugly off-field issues (legal charges and accusations) from his past that warrant consideration.

Is he still a good pass rusher? I feel like he's been looking pretty washed of late. I also heard he has Crohn's disease, which makes it hard for him to stay on the field.

 

[ReekofRams]

It's not from the Boy Scouts, I assure you.

THE GIRL SCOUTS!

 

[Ram_Rally]

As of last week he lead all interior DL in QB pressures. You don’t move on from him unless you are tanking the season. You must have missed the Colts game. He was playing great.

They tried to resign Gaines. He said something about California taxes being the reason he left.

Oh wow I had no clue

 

[simonblaze]

Someone tell McSnead if Rams don't trade for Garett Bolles or Chase Young at the deadline i'm going to keep bumping threads from 2011...

 

[Tumak61]

Relax guys. Rams aren't trading for anybody.

 

[Ramhusker]

Yes, you can.

Is he still a good pass rusher? I feel like he's been looking pretty washed of late. I also heard he has Crohn's disease, which makes it hard for him to stay on the field.

Where? I should clarify, where legally?

 

[Ramhusker]

California's #2 among all states in life expectancy. We're doing something right.

It's all the farm land.

 

[ReekofRams]

Yes, you can.

Is he still a good pass rusher? I feel like he's been looking pretty washed of late. I also heard he has Crohn's disease, which makes it hard for him to stay on the field.

No he doesn’t. A reporter said it sounds like Crohn’s Disease, but they’re assumption wasn’t based on fact.

 

[jrry32]

Where?

"Assault weapon" is whatever the state law defines it as. And I know you can buy numerous firearms in my state that are defined as "assault weapons" in other states.

No he doesn’t. A reporter said it sounds like Crohn’s Disease, but they’re assumption wasn’t based on fact.

Regardless, he is struggling to stay on the field due to some stomach ailment.

 

[Memento]

"Assault weapon" is whatever the state law defines it as. And I know you can buy numerous firearms in my state that are defined as "assault weapons" in other states.

Regardless, he is struggling to stay on the field due to some stomach ailment.

And he's a notorious woman-beater.

As a woman, I can't justify signing a piece of absolute elephantshit like Frank Clark.

 

[Ramhusker]

"Assault weapon" is whatever the state law defines it as. And I know you can buy numerous firearms in my state that are defined as "assault weapons" in other states.

Regardless, he is struggling to stay on the field due to some stomach ailment.

Oh, I forgot some people mistakenly call some guns "assault weapons". If it's not fully automatic, it's not the real deal. So, his weapon must have been an actual assault weapon because you can legally own the "wanna be guns" that look scary. And yeah, Clark would probably not work out.

 

[jrry32]

Oh, I forgot some people mistakenly call some guns "assault weapons". If it's not fully automatic, it's not the real deal. So, his weapon must have been an actual assault weapon because you can legally own the "wanna be guns" that look scary. And yeah, Clark would probably not work out.

A state could define a fork as an "assault weapon" if it so chose. The meaning of the term is determined by the definitions in the law, so there's no real point in arguing semantics over what the term means. It's arbitrary.

Frank Clark violated state law. It wasn't the first time he got in trouble. That's all that matters.

 

[Jacobarch]

There are no trades that will make us a Superbowl contender this year. It should be all about developing the young guys in order to build a championship roster over the next couple years. If we make the playoffs with that, then its a bonus. The only downside would be no high first round pick. But I'd take that if we make the playoffs.

High round picks mean nothing.

 

[RamFanWA]

High round picks mean nothing.

Beside, I think his first team was with the Seachickens...
Not exactly known for their stellar picks, off the field.

 

[Ramhusker]

A state could define a fork as an "assault weapon" if it so chose. The meaning of the term is determined by the definitions in the law, so there's no real point in arguing semantics over what the term means. It's arbitrary.

Frank Clark violated state law. It wasn't the first time he got in trouble. That's all that matters.

I agree about Clark but defining crap like that doesn’t mean anything to me. I’ll just go by the Constitution. But meanwhile back at the FA debate, the Rams aren’t going to sign a FA this year that is a well known name.