All-22 Breakdown (Raiders): Why the Tutu Gravity Effect is Opening Up This Passing Game and Stafford under pressure.

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Ram65

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2025 ROD Survivor Champion
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
10,992
ROD Credits
42,729
I wanted to dive into the All-22 film from the Raiders game to look at what's really happening with our passing game. There's been a lot of speculation about Stafford's execution, the WRs and protection. I didn't know what I would see in this All-22 review from the Raiders game. What I saw was how much Tutu opens up things for others. My main takeaway from the film is the ultimate car analogy: Stafford is the driver, while Puka is the engine and Tutu can be the turbocharger.

I broke down the timestamps from a great film review video (link at the bottom) to show what the tape is telling us. Full disclosure: I'm biased toward the Rams needing Tutu's speed. But the eye in the sky don't lie—Tutu’s deep speed is actively changing coverages, drawing safeties, and creating space, even if open the ball isn't always finding him due to pressure or other options. These are deep routes which he can easily cut off with different play designs for short or intermediate routes.

Play 19:20 First play bad play design with spacing. Poor protection got em on the stunt. 3rd and 5.

Play 2--19:30 TD pass good play design from the 3 yardline to KW.

Play 3--24: 00 This was 2nd and 5 yards. This is very interesting. MJD talked about this on BTH video. It's where Stafford throws incomplete between Higs and Tutu. Higs is wide open as Tutu is doing a deep corner post clearing Higs on his crossing route. Stafford misses the throw plain and simple. Stafford had time and could have stepped up and hit an open Tutu.

Play 4--28:20 3rd and 5 Stafford hits Puka over the middle after Puka motioned across the field. Standard 3rd down in route for Puka
On the other side of the field Tutu is open "butt ass naked though the middle of the field". As noted it was 3rd down and 5 so getting the first down is fine. It does show that Tutu can get open for Stafford.

Play 5-- 34:00 1st Down check down to Allen for 7 yards as Tutu clears out the left side which open up both Puka on a 15 yard out and Allen. Stafford with pressure takes the short check down. Zone coverage explained.

Play 6-- 38:00 1st and 10 Pass to Mumpfield the middle. Commentary explains that Mumpfield looked back and didn't get his head around fast enough while Stafford throws it behind him. Mumpfield makes the catch on the ground. If it was smoother on both WR and QB it would have been a TD.

Play 7-- 43 Minutes 3rd and 12 late Blitz. Good coverage with pressure. Incomplete to Puka with safety help. Commentator says Tutu had a step on the other side of the field but Stafford didn't have protection .

Play 8-- 46:30 Stafford rolled and flips hips and passes to Parkinson.

Play 9--47:30 Deep to Mumpfield. Not open pushed to the sideline.

Play 10--51:50 2nd and 6 Tutu goes deep taking safety with him. He takes two DBs with him. This opens up the entire right middle of the field where Parkinson gets an easy 15 yard completion and run. Commentator shows the impact of Tutu's speed to open up the field.

Play 11--55:30 Puka, Mumpfield and Tutu get open. Delayed blitz stunt makes Stafford throw quick for short completion to Puka. Good play by defense on pass rush.

Play 12--1.03.30 Stafford pressured. Notes that Mumpfield was getting open.

My Overall View:
This is just a small sampling of Stafford's 29 passing attempts, but it tells a story. Tutu didn't even record a target in this game, yet his tape proves he is the turbocharger assisting this offense by drawing heavy coverage and dictating how defenses play us.

The Rams absolutely must keep teams honest. Without Tutu's vertical speed on the outside stretching the field, defenses will just crowd the line of scrimmage to suffocatingly stop our run game and short passes. Puka is our engine, but Tutu is the threat that gives the engine room to run.

The real bottleneck is the protection. Stafford is constantly dealing with immediate pressure, unpicked-up stunts, and late blitzes that collapse the pocket before the deep routes can mature. If the line can give Stafford just a split second more to let the turbo kick in, this offense will be impossible to stop.

The Channel is 1st and Tuna.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-G9MZlCs0MQ
 
Play 19:20 First play bad play design with spacing. Poor protection got em on the stunt. 3rd and 5.
Bad design or Bad execution. I can't see McVay designing a stop and go on that quick of an out.
I'm leaning toward Mump running a stop and go, when he is supposed to be running a go.
A quick out is always going to need a quick clear out when WR's are lined up that close
and I can't see him design a fake that actually. pushes Mump's cover guy toward the out.
I'm not even a dot in the same universe as McVay in play design and I Would know better than to
do that.. JMHO
 

Bad design or Bad execution. I can't see McVay designing a stop and go on that quick of an out.
I'm leaning toward Mump running a stop and go, when he is supposed to be running a go.
A quick out is always going to need a quick clear out when WR's are lined up that close
and I can't see him design a fake that actually. pushes Mump's cover guy toward the out.
I'm not even a dot in the same universe as McVay in play design and I Would know better than to
do that.. JMHO
I appreciate the comment. I was hoping more posters would give opinions. Rewatching it, I agree with your perspective. Had Mumpfield gone straight up field Stafford could hit Tutu easily for the first down. As we know........we don't always know the play design. Very good chance Mumpfield ran the wrong route.
 
  • Like
Reactions: majrleaged
I don't think McVay will ever utilize him, because if it pays off, he'll have to answer the hard questions about why it took so long.


Obviously, this is not what I meant. Sure, they throw the occasional long pass to him. He averaged 30+ yard per catch last year.

I'm talking about 4-6 targets, each game, consistently.

It will NEVER happen.
It's silly that McVay would be afraid to utilize Tutu because of the hard questions he would face.

You didn't say 4-6 times a game. The all-22 review illustrated how Tutu doesn't need to get 4-6 targets to affect the passing game in a positive way. As long as he is in the game to stretch the field to keep defenses from overloading the box, He helps both passing and run games. They can only play 13P for so many plays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ramstien
Fact: Puka will be dead by Thanksgiving if they continue to not only target him so much, but also in patterns where he's going to be hit, sometimes by multiple defenders.
Fact: the Rams have no draft capital to trade considering the number of guys they won't be able to re-sign next year.
Fact: they have Daniels and Tutu on the roster. One is know for running good routes and making contested catches; the other possesses the most speed on offense you have.
Fact: cheap TDs are a rarity under McVay the last few years - everything seems to be long, multi-play drives.
Therefore: play the guys you have on your roster or fucking trade them for more 6'5" TEs so you can run fucking five TE personnel. They are on the roster for a reason - USE THEM. If the coaching staff is as smart as they're supposed to be, then they can scheme something the receivers and Stafford are comfortable with.
 
QIewsI.gif
 
  • Thread Winner
Reactions: dieterbrock
Yes and no. There are ways for McVay to scheme Tutu as a primary target. Example is the screen in the last game where he make the defender miss and turned it into 12 yards.

He chooses not to.

Nacua is over-targeted. McVay can and should influence this.
Yes, but on standard pass plays, while there will be a primary route it is ultimately the QB who decides where the ball goes. Example: Tampa playoff game. The pass to Kupp that set up the game winning field goal. He was running a "love of the game route" to clear for another player. He still got the ball.
 
Yes, but on standard pass plays, while there will be a primary route it is ultimately the QB who decides where the ball goes. Example: Tampa playoff game. The pass to Kupp that set up the game winning field goal. He was running a "love of the game route" to clear for another player. He still got the ball.
That's true.

The reason I wanted to look at some all-22 video/tape was to try and see the entire play play out from a more encompassing view than we get from the TV view. We can get some idea of what Stafford sees and if the pass catchers are getting open. Even then we still don't know the play call and if the players are running it correctly. The first response to the OP :
Bad design or Bad execution. I can't see McVay designing a stop and go on that quick of an out.
I'm leaning toward Mump r

That was a designed play for Tutu. Had Mumpfield ran the correct route it looks like it could have been a first down completion to Tutu. That's a kind of play that should be easy completions to Tutu. That also can help set up the wheel route that Stafford and Tutu connected on for 40 yards last week.

Play 3--24: 00 This was 2nd and 5 yards. This is very interesting. MJD talked about this on BTH video. It's where Stafford throws incomplete between Higs and Tutu. Higs is wide open as Tutu is doing a deep corner post clearing Higs on his crossing route. Stafford misses the throw plain and simple. Stafford had time and could have stepped up and hit an open Tutu.

Play 4--28:20 3rd and 5 Stafford hits Puka over the middle after Puka motioned across the field. Standard 3rd down in route for Puka
On the other side of the field Tutu is open "butt ass naked though the middle of the field". As noted it was 3rd down and 5 so getting the first down is fine. It does show that Tutu can get open for Stafford.
Two plays that Tutu was open deep and Stafford didn't go to him. That's fine because it opened up the pass to Higs because he occupied the safety. It's also about timing of down and distance. Last week' 40 yard completion to Tutu was on 2nd and 1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: majrleaged
Play 19:20 First play bad play design with spacing. Poor protection got em on the stunt. 3rd and 5.

Bad design or Bad execution. I can't see McVay designing a stop and go on that quick of an out.
I'm leaning toward Mump running a stop and go, when he is supposed to be running a go.
A quick out is always going to need a quick clear out when WR's are lined up that close
and I can't see him design a fake that actually. pushes Mump's cover guy toward the out.
I'm not even a dot in the same universe as McVay in play design and I Would know better than to
do that.. JMHO

Ram65​

"That was a designed play for Tutu. Had Mumpfield ran the correct route it looks like
it could have been a first down completion to Tutu."
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................

You called it a bad play design in your original post and I responded that it wasn't bad design and
that is was poor execution and more than likely the wrong route by Mump, altogether..
I fully understand who the play was designed for.
Why are you responding to my post by saying pretty much the exact same thing I posted.
to your 'bad play design" statement ????
I will try to be more detailed in any future responses.
 

Ram65​

"That was a designed play for Tutu. Had Mumpfield ran the correct route it looks like
it could have been a first down completion to Tutu."
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................

You called it a bad play design in your original post and I responded that it wasn't bad design and
that is was poor execution and more than likely the wrong route by Mump, altogether..
I fully understand who the play was designed for.
Why are you responding to my post by saying pretty much the exact same thing I posted.
to your 'bad play design" statement ????
I will try to be more detailed in any future responses.
I think you misunderstood my point. I wasn't responding to you. I was using your post a reference that we don't always know play design. Also, it's a refernece of a designed route for Tutu. You did fine.
I enjoy and respect all your posts.