This was the #1 offense last year…I’m expecting something like that again.The Rams will be a Defense-first team. Especially if........
This was the #1 offense last year…I’m expecting something like that again.The Rams will be a Defense-first team. Especially if........
Hrm. I think that's a bit of an oversimplification.To make the team, Bennett doesnt even have to prove he's worthy of potentially starting in Stafford's absence. He just needs to be able to make the throws in practice with the 1st/2nd teamers so they can limit Stafford's exposure. That's it.
This was the #1 offense last year…I’m expecting something like that again.
Hrm. I think that's a bit of an oversimplification.
Simpson's overall growth in camp and readiness will definitely factor in too, and there's a long way to go in camp to include all the scrimmages vs other teams and all the preseason games. So way I see it there is a competition and the results of that competition are going to matter.
Trying to read between the lines on the odd camp comment and highlight we've seen, it's hard to say to what extent that competition has favored Bennett. I think he's definitely winning thus far, but that's to be expected vs a QB who had so few starts in college. Also from that perspective I think your take is accurate as it pertains to a redshirt being good for him. But if Simpson can show a full grasp of the playbook and McVay starts thinking "hell I can probably give him the Goff treatment by helping him read pre-snap" that could affect things.
And again I think it's a factor that Bennett is likely to clear waivers if they cut him. Which again means he's not just playing for that backup role, but to force the Rams to reconsider his ability to clear waivers by kicking the rook's ass in the competition and showing the league he can run this offense with good efficiency. Because if he does that then I think it changes things significantly in his favor.
Does he have any value? 4 years and not a single pass attempt.Simpson keeps progressing, does Bennett become tradebait?
I feel I've stated that? I've never suggested Simpson was beating him out.That he's underwhelming is certainly a valid opinion. I'm seeing that he's had some up and down moments, but more importantly, I see where McVay has said his improvement from last year is night and day.
If you're using practice reports as your evidence, then you're also obligated to take their reports that it's not much of a competition between QB2 and QB3 so far. #2 is clearly Bennett.
Maybe your question/wondering more pertains to if they'll cut Bennett and bring in a vet?
Disagree, Garoppolo would do just fine. I hate that he has 9er stench but lets not pretend like je didn't win with a pretty good defense in SF. Obviously rather have Stafford stay upright and healthy.Sure, Kyle Allen can steer the ship in Buffalo for 8 games. Jarrett Stidham in Denver? We all saw how THAT was last Playoffs. Burrow goes down er......I'll check who Cincinnati 's backup is and get back to you......
If Stafford goes down for 8 games we're in major trouble. Thats with either Garoppolo OR Simpson stepping in. So if we HAD TO play run-heavy and rely on our Defense you'd equate that to Fisher days??? With THIS Defense? Really???
What if we drafted Creed Humphrey instead of Tutu?You must be new here.![]()
Won't help the defense they are on the field all day if the offense craps the bed all day long. Defenses need some rest to be effective. It'll be interesting to find out but I rather not lolThe expectation should be that our defense holds teams to 10 points. If Stafford goes down, that unit will have to carry the day.
I'm not even sure if anyone would poach him off the practice squad. I haven't been sold on Bennett since he had to take a year off for whatever reason. Makes me question his drive. His love of football. I think drafting Simpson is a huge tell too.Does he have any value? 4 years and not a single pass attempt.
Disagree. Rams made it clear they want to take their time with Simpson. There is absolutely no reason to rush him. There isn’t a competition unless Bennett completely shits the bed. It’s like the Ferguson treatment.Hrm. I think that's a bit of an oversimplification.
Simpson's overall growth in camp and readiness will definitely factor in too, and there's a long way to go in camp to include all the scrimmages vs other teams and all the preseason games. So way I see it there is a competition and the results of that competition are going to matter.
Trying to read between the lines on the odd camp comment and highlight we've seen, it's hard to say to what extent that competition has favored Bennett. I think he's definitely winning thus far, but that's to be expected vs a QB who had so few starts in college. Also from that perspective I think your take is accurate as it pertains to a redshirt being good for him. But if Simpson can show a full grasp of the playbook and McVay starts thinking "hell I can probably give him the Goff treatment by helping him read pre-snap" that could affect things.
And again I think it's a factor that Bennett is likely to clear waivers if they cut him. Which again means he's not just playing for that backup role, but to force the Rams to reconsider his ability to clear waivers by kicking the rook's ass in the competition and showing the league he can run this offense with good efficiency. Because if he does that then I think it changes things significantly in his favor.
DEnver had a really good defense as well and the Patriots weren't too bad.That's true but the two best defenses in the NFL last season were the Seahawks and Texans.
I'm not even sure if anyone would poach him off the practice squad. I haven't been sold on Bennett since he had to take a year off for whatever reason. Makes me question his drive. His love of football. I think drafting Simpson is a huge tell too.
The Pats’ D was good in the SB. I bet they were pissed at their O.DEnver had a really good defense as well and the Patriots weren't too bad.