Simms is on drugs if he thinks the Giants swap with Washington in the first, let alone the Steelers and Browns trading with each other.
Yeah we don't win that game without Scott's hit. So I'll always love him for laying that fuckin prick out.Cmon, admit it. When scott lit up dweebo…you almost came. Lol.
So we sit Kinchens? Not sure I'm a big fan of that, he looked pretty good last year.Lake plays the star with Kurl and EMW at safety.
Only way I'd even consider that is getting back the Cards 2nd this year. '27 1st's are extremely valuable.He does make my earlier point that if it's all about this year then why not trade 27' assets to get an impact guy now? Again, I wouldn't, but they might. Especially if they believe Stafford intends to play in 27'.
He also makes my point on getting a quality WR at 61. You don't have to pick one at 13.
What do you mean "almost"?Cmon, admit it. When scott lit up dweebo…you almost came.
No bueno.NFL.com just released a 7 round mock. In the first round they have us trading back with the Lions (who take Fano). We drop to 17 and get 5th this year and a 3rd next and still get Lemon. Pretty ideal.
2.61 - Dunker, OL
3.93 - Jaishawn Barham, Edge (don't love that)
5.157 - Behren Morton, QB (don't love that either - thought he was a UDFA guy)
6.207 - Justin Jefferson, LB
7.232 - David Gusta, DT
7.251 - Riggie Virgil, WR
7.252 - Hazekiah Masses, CB
Kinda don't love it outside of the trade back and Lemon.
The Rams haven't said that it's all about this year. In fact, Snead said he's not sure what the balance between present and future is, but suggested they may tilt more towards the present while still planning for the future. That statement doesn't imply it's all about the present only.He does make my earlier point that if it's all about this year then why not trade 27' assets to get an impact guy now? Again, I wouldn't, but they might. Especially if they believe Stafford intends to play in 27'.
He also makes my point on getting a quality WR at 61. You don't have to pick one at 13.
I agree with that. Some fans are saying it's all in for this year though, but sure Snead has said it's a little of both.The Rams haven't said that it's all about this year. In fact, Snead said he's not sure what the balance between present and future is, but suggested they may tilt more towards the present while still planning for the future. That statement doesn't imply it's all about the present only.
I agree in the WR. It feels like 61 makes the most sense.
Yeah, they want to go OL, but they can't take one at 3. Plus, they need more picks, especially if they want to make sure they get Simpson and thus must burn an extra pick to trade up into the end of rd 1.I don't believe the Cards are drafting Love. They are being extremely obvious in trying to drum up interest for a team to trade up with them that wants to draft Love.
I think Les sniffs in every direction every year.