OFFICIAL 2026 Memes and Other NFL Fun Stuff

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
snackdaddy said:
Who needs big boobs? You can do a lot more with the rest of her.
images
Click to expand...
Indiana Fever Point GIF
 
  • 5HaHa
Reactions: RamFan503, RamsSince1969, RamFanWA and 2 others

Despite huge additions, the Los Angeles Rams' offseason was hit with a disappointing grade.​

The Los Angeles Rams are in a "win-now" type of structure, similar to what the team engaged in during the 2021 season, which led to a Super Bowl win. Additions like Trent McDuffie and Jaylen Watson were coupled with the blockbuster deal to land Myles Garrett.
Despite these moves, not everyone is a big believer that the Rams made all the right decisions. ESPN's Seth Walder gave the organization a "C+" for their offseason performance.
"Surplus value doesn't tell the whole story, however. It makes sense to prioritize the present as Super Bowl favorites with a waning quarterback window. But what kind of present value tariff is worth it? Should the Rams sacrifice two percentage points of future Super Bowl probability later for one point today? Three? It's an open question, but Garrett for Verse straight up would have been reasonable and a win-win, even with the surplus value loss. But the addition of three picks, including a first-rounder, is too rich for me," Walder wrote.

I had to put this in the Memes and Fun Stuff because this is like giving the Dodgers a C+ rating for getting Shohei Ohtani on the team.
 
  • 8Like
  • 6HaHa
  • High Five
Reactions: HighDesertRam, rdw, CGI_Ram and 12 others
RamsSince1969 said:

Despite huge additions, the Los Angeles Rams' offseason was hit with a disappointing grade.​

The Los Angeles Rams are in a "win-now" type of structure, similar to what the team engaged in during the 2021 season, which led to a Super Bowl win. Additions like Trent McDuffie and Jaylen Watson were coupled with the blockbuster deal to land Myles Garrett.
Despite these moves, not everyone is a big believer that the Rams made all the right decisions. ESPN's Seth Walder gave the organization a "C+" for their offseason performance.
"Surplus value doesn't tell the whole story, however. It makes sense to prioritize the present as Super Bowl favorites with a waning quarterback window. But what kind of present value tariff is worth it? Should the Rams sacrifice two percentage points of future Super Bowl probability later for one point today? Three? It's an open question, but Garrett for Verse straight up would have been reasonable and a win-win, even with the surplus value loss. But the addition of three picks, including a first-rounder, is too rich for me," Walder wrote.

I had to put this in the Memes and Fun Stuff because this is like giving the Dodgers a C+ rating for getting Shohei Ohtani on the team.
Click to expand...
Seth Walder gargles testicles.
 
  • 7HaHa
  • Like
  • Cheers
Reactions: rdw, CGI_Ram, Mackeyser and 8 others
Tano said:
I will say - I will take a C+ if we win the SuperBowl.

I trust Snead and McVay to keep us going after next year.
Click to expand...
I will up your will say and say that I don’t give two shits what ole Seth has to say and he can eat a big ole bag of dicks. And I hear he sits down to pee.
 
  • Like
  • Cheers
  • HaHa
Reactions: RamBall, Ramstien, Faceplant and 2 others
RamsSince1969 said:

Despite huge additions, the Los Angeles Rams' offseason was hit with a disappointing grade.​

The Los Angeles Rams are in a "win-now" type of structure, similar to what the team engaged in during the 2021 season, which led to a Super Bowl win. Additions like Trent McDuffie and Jaylen Watson were coupled with the blockbuster deal to land Myles Garrett.
Despite these moves, not everyone is a big believer that the Rams made all the right decisions. ESPN's Seth Walder gave the organization a "C+" for their offseason performance.
"Surplus value doesn't tell the whole story, however. It makes sense to prioritize the present as Super Bowl favorites with a waning quarterback window. But what kind of present value tariff is worth it? Should the Rams sacrifice two percentage points of future Super Bowl probability later for one point today? Three? It's an open question, but Garrett for Verse straight up would have been reasonable and a win-win, even with the surplus value loss. But the addition of three picks, including a first-rounder, is too rich for me," Walder wrote.

I had to put this in the Memes and Fun Stuff because this is like giving the Dodgers a C+ rating for getting Shohei Ohtani on the team.
Click to expand...
1783083422208.webp
 
  • 7HaHa
Reactions: rdw, CGI_Ram, Mackeyser and 4 others
RamFan503 said:
I will up your will say and say that I don’t give two shits what ole Seth has to say and he can eat a big ole bag of dicks. And I hear he sits down to pee.
Click to expand...
He's probably one of the people who said winning the Superbowl wasn't worth it because they mortgaged the future for it. Nevermind after one injury riddled season they were back in the playoffs two years later and been a regular playoff team since then. And considered the favorites again 5 years after the Superbowl win.
 
  • Like
  • High Five
Reactions: RamBall, David Ray, André and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back