- Joined
- May 9, 2018
- Messages
- 5,390
Here are some interesting stats:
During the regular season, the Rams and Bengals ran the ball (excluding QB runs) with similar frequency:
Rams: 388 running plays (22.8/game)
Bengals: 396 running plays (23.3/game)
In the playoffs, however, the Rams use of the running game has increased, while the Bengals have run the ball less:
Rams: 82 running plays (27.3/game)
Bengals: 61 running plays (20.3/game)
If this trend continues, I think that bodes well for the Rams. The Bengals have been susceptible to the run in the playoffs, as they have allowed 5.6/carry on handoffs to RBs. The Chiefs inexplicably did not continue to pound the ball when they had their lead, but the Rams are unlikely to repeat this mistake.
If the Rams find some early success running the ball, and continue to run (not exclusively, but strategically) if they build a lead, that's a great formula for success. Conversely, if the Bengals abandon the run, that will only make things more difficult for their OL against the Rams' pass rush.
During the regular season, the Rams and Bengals ran the ball (excluding QB runs) with similar frequency:
Rams: 388 running plays (22.8/game)
Bengals: 396 running plays (23.3/game)
In the playoffs, however, the Rams use of the running game has increased, while the Bengals have run the ball less:
Rams: 82 running plays (27.3/game)
Bengals: 61 running plays (20.3/game)
If this trend continues, I think that bodes well for the Rams. The Bengals have been susceptible to the run in the playoffs, as they have allowed 5.6/carry on handoffs to RBs. The Chiefs inexplicably did not continue to pound the ball when they had their lead, but the Rams are unlikely to repeat this mistake.
If the Rams find some early success running the ball, and continue to run (not exclusively, but strategically) if they build a lead, that's a great formula for success. Conversely, if the Bengals abandon the run, that will only make things more difficult for their OL against the Rams' pass rush.