- Joined
- May 27, 2013
- Messages
- 236
- Name
- Anthony
Cyril Richardson (OG), Ty Zimmerman (SS), Ifo Ekpre-Olomu (CB), and Bishop Sankey (RB)
http://www.ramsaddiction.com/pw1314w7
http://www.ramsaddiction.com/pw1314w7
fearsomefour said:I like the idea of drafting a OT and G this next year. But, I also want to draft a DT (to replace Langford) and a CB.
Would prefer to move Finnigan to S to extend his career and keep his experience and leadership on the roster. He may excel there filling the role that Mikkel did before, playing close to the line, blitzing and being a sure tackler in run support.
Ramhusker said:fearsomefour said:I like the idea of drafting a OT and G this next year. But, I also want to draft a DT (to replace Langford) and a CB.
Would prefer to move Finnigan to S to extend his career and keep his experience and leadership on the roster. He may excel there filling the role that Mikkel did before, playing close to the line, blitzing and being a sure tackler in run support.
That's a great idea. I can't make my mind up on which way to go in the draft quite yet but if it were tomorrow, I'd be leaning towards OT, G, and CB also.
ramsaddiction thinking we're set at OC:
I'm fine with moving Cortland to safety next year, but if he won't take a pay cut, he deserves to be cut. He's scheduled to hit the cap at $10M next year and I don't think he'll be worth that at any position.
I'm not sure how big of a priority OT is. Albeit a small sample size, I think Barksdale has been decent. The interior OL is the biggest cause for concern for me.
It's hard to say this early, but right now my priorities would be:
1) CB (depending on what Trumaine shows throughout the rest of the season)
2) S
3) OG
4) OG
5) RB
6) DT
7) OLB
fearsomefour said:I like the idea of drafting a OT and G this next year. But, I also want to draft a DT (to replace Langford) and a CB.
Would prefer to move Finnigan to S to extend his career and keep his experience and leadership on the roster. He may excel there filling the role that Mikkel did before, playing close to the line, blitzing and being a sure tackler in run support.
V3 said:fearsomefour said:I like the idea of drafting a OT and G this next year. But, I also want to draft a DT (to replace Langford) and a CB.
Would prefer to move Finnigan to S to extend his career and keep his experience and leadership on the roster. He may excel there filling the role that Mikkel did before, playing close to the line, blitzing and being a sure tackler in run support.
Why draft a DT high to replace Langford when he's playing better than Brockers?
I hate spending high picks on DT's. Just as high of a bust rate as QB and WR but with less impact.
We NEED a true shutdown CB and a true FS. We only have strong safeties. I'm not sure if Finnegan would work as a FS but you might as well try it since we're stuck with that contract. Try and get something out of it.