The Rams 2023 Offseason Strategy - Load Up the Offense

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,225
Name
Burger man
This post from @PhillyRam makes a lot of sense;

Cowherd, who does seem to have some source with the Rams based on past reporting on McVay retirement talk before it became a huge story and Stafford's offseason injury being serious before the Rans admitted it was...I think this comment might be legit.

Today he stated that he was told that they want to move Ramsey and then load up picks and FAs on the offense to give McVay the tools to put together a top 5 offense again.

That makes sense to me as I stated before. It's an offensive league. It's all about keeping your QB clean and controlling the LOS so your QB can deal.

If we lack the fire power (picks and cap $) to build equally on offense and defense, does it make sense to focus on one of them?

I.e…. Build the best offense we can. It’s McVay’s specialty. Try to be very good there, because a really good offense helps a weaker defense.

We can’t do it all. Might as well load up the offense!
 

dang

Legend
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
7,497
I’m reposting from another thread:
One thing the Rams aren’t under McSnead is stagnant. They are always on the move to improve. I believe the offensive shit show the Rams fielded last year had to eat into McVays sanity. So I’m kinda hoping they load up the OL with the best FA/Draft picks they can muster. Add OBJ and a bruiser RB. Then rock and roll on offense. Secondarily fill in the defense with remaining options at CB/Edge.
 

PARAM

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
4,362
I’m reposting from another thread

So I’m kinda hoping they load up the OL with the best FA/Draft picks they can muster. Add OBJ and a bruiser RB. Then rock and roll on offense.
OBJ? An oft-injured WR, who hasn't played in what will be 19 months by opening day and has a history of non-health related issues? :wow2:

Secondarily fill in the defense with remaining options at CB/Edge.
Most fans hate Morris and believe he's incompetent, so no loss there by taking weapons away. It might go totally unnoticed.
 

AvengerRam

Benevolent Troublemaker
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
5,380
Do It Episode 3 GIF by Star Wars
 

Psycho_X

Legend
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
12,122
I think that's been the goal every year really. The defense Morris runs is predicated on an offense being able to score points. And the defense Morris runs can be what it is without high priced players in the backfield. He needs a pass rush and people who can follow direction in the backfield and that's about it. At that point you need an offense that can score. It's generally the type of team that wins the Super Bowl in this era.
 

Faceplant

Still celebrating Superbowl LVI
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Pick'em Champion
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
9,990
I believe this makes sense. I just don't know if I believe they can do it. This offense has been getting worse (IMO) since 2018. Good defenses have all but solved it and they do not (currently) have the type of players to run it successfully regardless.

Where are they going to find the $ or draft capital to fix the OL, TE, WR and RB positions?? Lol... It was literally just Stafford to Kupp last year... Even when they were healthy. It was a horrible offense.
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
6,996
Name
Scott
I believe this makes sense. I just don't know if I believe they can do it. This offense has been getting worse (IMO) since 2018. Good defenses have all but solved it and they do not (currently) have the type of players to run it successfully regardless.

Where are they going to find the $ or draft capital to fix the OL, TE, WR and RB positions?? Lol... It was literally just Stafford to Kupp last year... Even when they were healthy. It was a horrible offense.
Trading Ramsey and releasing Floyd, with a post June 1st designation on Floyd, frees up $20M.

They can then restructure Kupp by pushing cap dollars into 24' since Ramsey clears $28M in cap room next yr and Floyd also clears a minimum of 12M next yr even with paetial cap hit carrying into next yr since his $22M 24' cap hit will at least be cut in half

So they could likely add another 10-15M there with a Kupp restructure among others.

So the end result of the Ramsey & Floyd moves could end up giving them about $30M in 23' cap relief and 30M next yr as well.

This is why they are making these moves now.
 

El Chapo Jr

Legend
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
5,076
Trading Ramsey and releasing Floyd, with a post June 1st designation on Floyd, frees up $20M.

They can then restructure Kupp by pushing cap dollars into 24' since Ramsey clears $28M in cap room next yr and Floyd also clears a minimum of 12M next yr even with paetial cap hit carrying into next yr since his $22M 24' cap hit will at least be cut in half

So they could likely add another 10-15M there with a Kupp restructure among others.

So the end result of the Ramsey & Floyd moves could end up giving them about $30M in 23' cap relief and 30M next yr as well.

This is why they are making these moves now.
Does it truly give em that give them that relief if they reload? Can't extending Ramsey free up room too? I'm guessing anything we go after in FA, considering the massive amounts of CAP other teams have as well, is pretty much an indicator we'll also overpay for free agents. Not necessarily a fan of this strategy. We already know how Ramsey fits in with us.
 

dang

Legend
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
7,497
Trading Ramsey and releasing Floyd, with a post June 1st designation on Floyd, frees up $20M.

They can then restructure Kupp by pushing cap dollars into 24' since Ramsey clears $28M in cap room next yr and Floyd also clears a minimum of 12M next yr even with paetial cap hit carrying into next yr since his $22M 24' cap hit will at least be cut in half

So they could likely add another 10-15M there with a Kupp restructure among others.

So the end result of the Ramsey & Floyd moves could end up giving them about $30M in 23' cap relief and 30M next yr as well.

This is why they are making these moves now.
And if traded Ramsey should garner 2 2023 draft picks. This is more about 2024 than 2023 for me but some tough moves were inevitable (as well as disheartening).
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
6,996
Name
Scott
Does it truly give em that give them that relief if they reload? Can't extending Ramsey free up room too? I'm guessing anything we go after in FA, considering the massive amounts of CAP other teams have as well, is pretty much an indicator we'll also overpay for free agents. Not necessarily a fan of this strategy. We already know how Ramsey fits in with us.
Well look at it this way.

1. They had 5 contracts ballooning all at the same time in 23, 24, 25...Ramsey, Floyd, Donald, Stafford, and Kupp.

2. They are over the 23' and 24' projected cap already.

3. Donald really isn't tradeable without a massive dead cap hit and Stafford can't go anywhere without a complete rebuild.

4. Floyd is an easy June 1st cut to clear $15M this yr and abt $10M next yr.

5. Ramsey clears $5M this yr, $28M next yr, and $23M in 25'. Oh and he gets you back 2 -4 premium draft picks (could be trade downs) who are cheap labor for 4 or 5 yrs.

6. All of that gained 23', 24' & 25' cap allows for FA spending & further restructures into 24 & 25 to free up more 23' cap room.

7. Contracts for any new FAs can be cheap for 23' & 24' and their larger cap hits will hit when Donald and Stafford are done in 25' and beyond.

So as painful as it is, it's an easy decision for me. Plus this is a strong CB FA class and a good CB draft class.
 

Tano

Legend
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
10,012
Going back to offense,, what does everyone think of making Perkins a running back instead of a back-up QB? He at least would be the 3rd QB if both the starter and back-up got hurt in the same game "cough" you still suck 49ers "cough".

I think Perkins could be used on occasion as a RB who can possibly throw on a couple plays a game.

Just a thought.
 

dang

Legend
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
7,497
Going back to offense,, what does everyone think of making Perkins a running back instead of a back-up QB? He at least would be the 3rd QB if both the starter and back-up got hurt in the same game "cough" you still suck 49ers "cough".

I think Perkins could be used on occasion as a RB who can possibly throw on a couple plays a game.

Just a thought.
So RB4/QB3? He is a weapon with his legs.
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
6,996
Name
Scott
Going back to offense,, what does everyone think of making Perkins a running back instead of a back-up QB? He at least would be the 3rd QB if both the starter and back-up got hurt in the same game "cough" you still suck 49ers "cough".

I think Perkins could be used on occasion as a RB who can possibly throw on a couple plays a game.

Just a thought.
I would tell him to try RB or walk.
 

RamsOfCastamere

I drink things, and know nothing
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
8,064
Going back to offense,, what does everyone think of making Perkins a running back instead of a back-up QB? He at least would be the 3rd QB if both the starter and back-up got hurt in the same game "cough" you still suck 49ers "cough".

I think Perkins could be used on occasion as a RB who can possibly throw on a couple plays a game.

Just a thought.
Scrambling on pass plays and designed runs are completely different. He's 6'3 215 and ran 4.68 at the combine. Too slow and not big enough to be a power back. I'd rather stick with Kyren Williams.