TexRamFan said:As far as the running game goes, I believe the Pats have less rushing yards than the Rams. Yet they are 3-0. I understand we need a running game to compete with teams, but to put and empasis so much stress on it in press conferences and interviews is making me crazy. This franchise stresses that you run the ball and everything else spins off that. But what if we pass the ball well and the running game spins itself off that?
Mojo Ram said:Some "offensive" Rams statistics through four games:
NFL rank
Yards/gm 301.8 (30th)
Yards/play 4.5 (30th)
3rd down conversion percentage 26% (31st)
Time of possession/gm 28:16 (25th)
Penalties 27 (tied for 3rd)
Rushing attempts/gm 18.2 (29th)
Rush yrds/gm 47.2 (31st)
Rush yrds/carry 2.6 (tied for 30th)
Points/gm 17.2 (28th)
QB hits allowed 27 (2nd)
Receiving yards/reception 10.2 (27th)
:fk:
Nothing most of us didn't know already...but these are abysmal numbers through the first quarter of the season. Growing pains?
My take on the big picture...
The second qtr of the season is now upon us. I felt we needed to get here no worse than 2-2. Instead we're staring at 1-3 and last place in division.
vs Jacksonville
@ Houston
@ Carolina
vs Seattle
Again i look at this stretch and Rams must get out of this at no worse than 2-2.
Beat Jacksonville,a MUST win obviously,and try to gain some confidence for two straight road games. Try to get one of those(Carolina?) and finish with a big division game at home(again).
Do that and we're sitting at 3-5...not good but not disastrous either. Another 1-3 finish through this second qtr of games and the Rams' playoff hopes are finished at 2-6.
Rams need to take advantage of getting the NFL's worst team in our house. Go get a WIN dammit.
TexRamFan said:We are 1-3. It is what it is. Let's just focus on Jax. Get a win and go from there. Who cares whos next at this point. Win Sunday, give us something good to talk about and lets go from there.
TexRamFan said:I really feel mislead from the whole "buzz" he and the marketing team created in the preseason. He even went as far as to compare what the offense is aiming to do to the Saints. I mean, this offense is the complete opposite of the Saints. We may have pieces comparable to what the Saints have, but to try and be like them, you have to run a scheme similar to them. And that we don't, we don't even come close.
Angry Ram said:TexRamFan said:I really feel mislead from the whole "buzz" he and the marketing team created in the preseason. He even went as far as to compare what the offense is aiming to do to the Saints. I mean, this offense is the complete opposite of the Saints. We may have pieces comparable to what the Saints have, but to try and be like them, you have to run a scheme similar to them. And that we don't, we don't even come close.
He never said that. All KD said when mentioning the Saints and the Rams is that w/ all the signings and draft picks they'll have different packages designed for a specific receiver.
Actually, he said it here...TexRamFan said:Angry Ram said:TexRamFan said:I really feel mislead from the whole "buzz" he and the marketing team created in the preseason. He even went as far as to compare what the offense is aiming to do to the Saints. I mean, this offense is the complete opposite of the Saints. We may have pieces comparable to what the Saints have, but to try and be like them, you have to run a scheme similar to them. And that we don't, we don't even come close.
He never said that. All KD said when mentioning the Saints and the Rams is that w/ all the signings and draft picks they'll have different packages designed for a specific receiver.
This was KD's quote from an article I read at Turf Show Times and what I was referring too.
"I think you could see this offense resemble an offense like the Saints where you have 4 or 5 players catch 40-50 balls but nobody who catches 70 or 80. I'm not saying that we are the Saints offense, we need to improve to become that, but more that style where anybody can be a threat on any play. I think that is where we are evolving, letting the down, distance, scheme and coverage dictate who becomes the targeted player."
Here is the link: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.turfshowtimes.com/2013/7/21/4538480/kevin-demoff-talks-offense-sam-bradford-uniforms-and-more-ramsondemand" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.turfshowtimes.com/2013/7/21/ ... msondemand</a>
I did not expect this team to look like the Saints and march up and down the field at will. But when I think of the Saints, I think of them taking advantages of mismatches, exploiting defenses, and abusing opposing teams weaknesses to get the open guy the ball. They do this with motion, different looks and precise routes and timing. I really do not see the Rams evolving towards that scheme. This is what I got out of his comments and more specifically his point on the team evolving towards letting the down, distance and scheme coverage dictate the targeted player. We keep seeing the same scheme/game plan and keep hearing how they need to improve on running the ball.
God can you imagine? I think he'd be a superstar already on at least half nfl teamsUsername said:Tavon Austin would actually be used on the Saints