Snaps vs Min

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

shovelpass

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
4,733
Off
20250114_043013.jpg


Def
20250114_043030.jpg


ST
20250114_043111.jpg
 

Psycho_X

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
12,394
An interesting spread, Robinson getting a lot more snaps than Kupp. Only 1 snap for Tutu but I'm guessing that was more due to us being ahead most of the game. Higbee had a catch on almost half of his snaps... we need him back for Philly.
 

shovelpass

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
4,733
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #3
An interesting spread, Robinson getting a lot more snaps than Kupp. Only 1 snap for Tutu but I'm guessing that was more due to us being ahead most of the game. Higbee had a catch on almost half of his snaps... we need him back for Philly.
They played a lot of 2 and 3 TE sets. Kupp was in on 6 of the 12 personnel snaps, the rest were 11 personnel.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,279
On the PFF game review they mentioned that the Rams, who were among the least Cover 1 teams (think they were around 14%), played that call around 30% of the snaps and it obviously fucked with Darnold's mind. That call I think favors Durant, not so much Williams but overall the secondary stepped up big time. I mean the surprise element of the opponent playing a different look in certain situations will inevitably wear off and you gotta either surprise them again with your adjustment or execute your ass off without the surprise element.

So the players deserve a ton of cred man. Execution is what winning teams do. :bomb:
 

InfiniteRam

Starter
Joined
Oct 22, 2023
Messages
913
On the PFF game review they mentioned that the Rams, who were among the least Cover 1 teams (think they were around 14%), played that call around 30% of the snaps and it obviously fucked with Darnold's mind. That call I think favors Durant, not so much Williams but overall the secondary stepped up big time. I mean the surprise element of the opponent playing a different look in certain situations will inevitably wear off and you gotta either surprise them again with your adjustment or execute your ass off without the surprise element.

So the players deserve a ton of cred man. Execution is what winning teams do. :bomb:
I think this is what Shula WANTS to do, and maybe this will instill some trust in these guys.
 

shovelpass

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
4,733
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #7
Personnel grouping for the game:
11- 22 snaps
12- 26 snaps
13- 3 snaps
2 kneel downs
 

Karate61

There can be no excellence without effort.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Camp Reporter
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
7,080
Name
Jeff
Personnel grouping for the game:
11- 22 snaps
12- 26 snaps
13- 3 snaps
2 kneel downs
13 is one running back and 3 tight ends. Do I have that right?
 

OntarioRam

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
3,996
I am convinced Kupp is really struggling to put the injury behind him in terms of return to performance as opposed to return to play, so I do not find his snaps surprising. This game was effectively over early. Certainly by halftime and you could even argue midway through Q2. I suspect with that being the case they pivoted to load management for #10. He is such a capable blocker that I do not see him coming off the field much vs. Philly.
 

Faceplant

Still celebrating Superbowl LVI
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
10,252
Personnel grouping for the game:
11- 22 snaps
12- 26 snaps
13- 3 snaps
2 kneel downs
That's what I thought I saw out there. I wonder if that is McVay tweaking scheme due to the match up or by necessity. Kupp did not see a ton of action last night. I hope he's OK.

I did like what I saw from the 12 personnel packages though. Pretty sure our TDs were both 12P, but not sure.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,279
I am convinced Kupp is really struggling to put the injury behind him in terms of return to performance as opposed to return to play, so I do not find his snaps surprising. This game was effectively over early. Certainly by halftime and you could even argue midway through Q2. I suspect with that being the case they pivoted to load management for #10. He is such a capable blocker that I do not see him coming off the field much vs. Philly.
On that back shoulder Stafford completed to him he was about to run right past that corner. He was moving pretty good but had to stop and turn around. So idk but it would be nice to see Kupp get back in that playoff zone for this run, where he's killing it with the options and he and Stafford are on the same page. Maybe that's still coming if we're lucky.
 

shovelpass

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
4,733
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #14
That's what I thought I saw out there. I wonder if that is McVay tweaking scheme due to the match up or by necessity. Kupp did not see a ton of action last night. I hope he's OK.

I did like what I saw from the 12 personnel packages though. Pretty sure our TDs were both 12P, but not sure.
I think the change was to put Minnesota's defense in an awkward position. They like to play in their nickel and dime packages way more than base. So using heavier formations forces them to play more base.

Regular season
17.5% base, 52.7% nickel, 28.5% dime (leads league)

Wildcard
47.8% base, 34.% nickel, 17.4% dime

Philly played less base defense than Minnesota, so we could see this again on sunday
 

shovelpass

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
4,733
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #15
Defensive personnel
Screenshot_20250115_072755_Chrome.jpg



That's a big uptick in dime coverage. Could be because they were playing with a big lead through most of the game.
 

HX76

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 27, 2013
Messages
3,251
I needed Atwell to have over 20 yards receiving for two bets to come in. Would have netted me over £100. Cheers McVay!!
 

Soul Surfer

Legend
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
6,951
Name
Charles Mazyck
It almost looks like Nate Gallimore has replaced Bobby Brown as backup nose tackle
 

fanotodd

Diehard
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 2, 2013
Messages
2,337
Name
Fanotodd
I think the change was to put Minnesota's defense in an awkward position. They like to play in their nickel and dime packages way more than base. So using heavier formations forces them to play more base.

Regular season
17.5% base, 52.7% nickel, 28.5% dime (leads league)

Wildcard
47.8% base, 34.% nickel, 17.4% dime

Philly played less base defense than Minnesota, so we could see this again on sunday
I hope so.
It looks like you’re on to something.

I’m for anything that takes a team out of their norm. It is obviously better to be the team dictating change than reacting to it.
 

XXXIVwin

Legend
Joined
Jun 1, 2015
Messages
5,066
It almost looks like Nate Gallimore has replaced Bobby Brown as backup nose tackle
BB3 got banged up with a shoulder, so Neville got more snaps.

Would be great to have both big fellas available vs Eagles

McVay said he "expects" BB3 to be able to play
 

InfiniteRam

Starter
Joined
Oct 22, 2023
Messages
913
BB3 got banged up with a shoulder, so Neville got more snaps.

Would be great to have both big fellas available vs Eagles

McVay said he "expects" BB3 to be able to play
BB3 needs to be good to go. Would love to see a 5-man D-Line, with Speights paying tight as a 6th in the box.