- Joined
- Jun 25, 2014
- Messages
- 3,126
- Name
- blue4
http://www.washingtonpost.com/expre...-trade-kirk-cousins-for-an-offensive-lineman/
They want Barksdale for Cousins.
They want Barksdale for Cousins.
No, one sports writer for the Washington Post wants Barksdale for Cousins.
Is that what Cousins is and is that what Barksdale is? I don't think so on both accounts.Considering it's highly unlikely we succeed this year in any meaningful way, if we can get a young experienced starter-level qb in exchange for a journeyman tackle, I'd say do the trade before the Redskins change their minds...
Barks might be our best lineman. Not only is he good, he plays every down.
Three out of five of our lineman have issues staying on the field and the fourth(Dahl) didn't impress week one.
It's not just here, the talking heads love that guy. I don't get it eitherDear lord I will never understand the Kirk Cousins love on this site. It is like he has a fan club here. That trade would make me vomit.
I can't see how cousins is better alternative than keenum. Even if it was a toss up in ability, keenum 2 week head start in the system is enough for me.
I'd trade them this guyblue4 wearing his GM hat:
That team would be better off trading RGme for a limeman.