The thing I don't like about Gordo's grades are the knee-jerk underanalysis that goes into it.
For example, lets look at RB and DB.
RB is graded at an A...had the Rams lost it would have been a D or C, guaranteed. He would have put more emphasis on the low YPC and devalued Cunninghams big run even more.
DB is graded as an A...had the Rams lost he would have given them a C based on Jenkins making a habit of giving up a big play every week. Probably would have paid more attention to the one drive that Indy marched down the field as well.
No doubt in my mind he would have scrutinized the low passing attempts as well had the score been different.
He's rarely balanced...always extreme to one direction or the other. His grades don't have any kind of consistent process...basically he doesn't really "grade" them...he puts a generic label on it and follows up with a recap. Pretty lame really.