Rams and NFL interesting stats

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
I don't know if this "fits" under interesting stats but the 6 games before Davante was injured, the offense averaged 22.5 PPG. The 2 games we've played without Davante, we've averaged 29.5 PPG. I'm not suggesting we're worse with Davante, we're actually much better. But it's freaking weird how an unexpected WTF? moment jumps out.

And.....after losing to SF, we've gone on to lose 3 games.....1 on a absolute terrible call by the officials reversing a game clinching pick, one on a blocked 48 yd FG in OT, and one on another terrible fucking call by the officials giving Arizona the chance to kick a GWFG. This team could easily be 7-1, despite all our injuries and flaws.
 
  • Thread Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Ramstien, RamBall and LARAMSinFeb.
PARAM said:
I don't know if this "fits" under interesting stats but the 6 games before Davante was injured, the offense averaged 22.5 PPG. The 2 games we've played without Davante, we've averaged 29.5 PPG. I'm not suggesting we're worse with Davante, we're actually much better. But it's freaking weird how an unexpected WTF? moment jumps out.

And.....after losing to SF, we've gone on to lose 3 games.....1 on a absolute terrible call by the officials reversing a game clinching pick, one on a blocked 48 yd FG in OT, and one on another terrible fucking call by the officials giving Arizona the chance to kick a GWFG. This team could easily be 7-1, despite all our injuries and flaws.
Click to expand...
This is a noteworthy stat. Last year, we played four games without either Adams or Nacua. They averaged 33 points/game. It's simply not true that the offense struggles without one of their top two WRs.

I believe the reason for this is because it forces McVay and Stafford out of their comfort zones of relying too much on their top two options. The offense is obviously more efficient when they spread the ball around to many targets.
 
  • 5Like
Reactions: Ramstien, PARAM, Faceplant and 2 others
fanotodd said:
Would that be considered a 3 and out?
Click to expand...
IMO, saying 3 and out is like saying three strikes and you’re out. So no.

On the other hand, the offense failed to get a first down on the drive. So yes.

Hey. What can I say? It’s Election Day. I’ve been listening to too many politicians.
 
  • 3Cheers
  • HaHa
Reactions: fanotodd, Ramstien, RamBall and 1 other person
fanotodd said:
Not that it really matters, but I was wondering…
Last weekend I saw a team get a TO on their opponent’s side of the field. They failed to move the ball three straight plays and then kicked the gimmee FG.

Would that be considered a 3 and out?
Click to expand...
No counted it's counted as 3 plays and a punt.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back