- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
- Messages
- 5,348
Hold on there the player reps had the proposal in their hands MONDAY but didn't approve it until after the deadline,it was mentioned during the Mon broadcast that no vote would occur until Tuesday because 4 team player reps were playing so blaming the league consistently for every disappointment is just bogusFigures. Don't trust a thing out of the NFL these days.
That said, he probably wouldn't have figured into the offensive game plan. Hasn't practiced with the team all week. I expect, hope, he'll be able to suit up against the Cowgirls though.
Just guessing, but I think they will drop one of their 5 RB's before Givens! Probably Watts, he low man on the totum poll, Reynolds has ST value!I couldn't see them dressing him anyway / he hasn't been in the building for 2 weeks.
Is this Chris Givens last game in horns?
Wouldn't they drop Pettis?I couldn't see them dressing him anyway / he hasn't been in the building for 2 weeks.
Is this Chris Givens last game in horns?
Wouldn't they drop Pettis?
No no no. They won't cut Givens, Pettis, or Watts. Conrath was called up when Long was IRed. It would be most logical to simply bump him back down to PS when Bailey returns. Watts was the up man on the KR unit last week and was RB3 (Mason was actually inactive). CG made a couple nice grabs, and is KR1. Pettis is a backup PR and still has value in 3rd and short situations, redzone, and vs zone coverage.
Are you going to dress 6 WRs on game day?
I think Conrath has value / and Fisher likes length - but you and I both know that it comes down to positional numbers.
Pettis and CG made some nice plays today. And Conrath did...nothing. He was on the bench. He has no value. The dude is tall and that is it. Very weak for his size, gets pushed around. You never even realize he's on the field when he dresses