I believe nicks would be an upgrade over a few of our current recievers. Why not target nicks for Bradford. I mean who wouldn't want Byrd and Vernon but let be realistic that's way to expensive even if possible.
Quick has been here for 2 years and Bradford only played 5+ games in 2013. He has shown improvement and the team is going to give him a chance to play. How is he supposed to do more if the QB does not throw him the ball? 2 of the nine games started with KC he got 0 targets.So we should just trudge on with Brian quick who has shown nothing in 3 years or sign Sammy watkins(Oh wait no he will just take development time away as well) some times you gotta take risks if the price is right.
Assuming we get Robinson in a small trade down for a second, a quality guard should still be available say at 36,38. Hopefully! Rather have younger guard at a cheaper price through the draft!Verner and Schwartz, then Draft Greg Robinson and trade down from 13th to add another 2nd rd pick so we can take an luxury OG in rd 2
I wouldn't call actually having a starting caliber LG a luxury my friend.PressureD41 thinking like Thurston Howell III:
trade down from 13th to add another 2nd rd pick so we can take an luxury OG in rd 2