- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Messages
- 1,424
- Name
- Phil
Apologies. Not sure if this will work but Kent Sterling is admitting his words about Sam Bradford were poorly chosen
Never ruin a perfectly good apology with an excuse.
And.......he did just that. That was as left handed an apology as he could have written.
Essentially he said "it's true, I just shouldn't have said it".
My belief is that the way people behave toward others speaks to their character, and character defines an ability to lead.
All I see is...Andrew Luck talks to reporters more enthusiastically than Sam Bradford...therefore I like Luck better.
How someone talks to the media is a pretty lame way to judge a persons character.
All I see is...Andrew Luck talks to reporters more enthusiastically than Sam Bradford...therefore I like Luck better.
How someone talks to the media is a pretty lame way to judge a persons character.
All I see is...Andrew Luck talks to reporters more enthusiastically than Sam Bradford...therefore I like Luck better.
How someone talks to the media is a pretty lame way to judge a persons character.
Unless you're under pressure from your boss. Or possibly your peers.V3 take on Kent's views:
If that's what he meant to say then own it. If he believes that then why backtrack. The only reason to backtrack from something like that is if it was false.
It really is an embarrassment for Kent.
Any sports journalist worth his salt removes personal feelings when writing about an athlete. What he did was write a piece that had focus about Bradford being a dick. It's really low brow shyte. And it's sure to get him some attention and possibly an interview at ESPN.
Apologies. Not sure if this will work but Kent Sterling is admitting his words about Sam Bradford were poorly chosen