- Joined
- Jul 31, 2010
- Messages
- 3,010
- Name
- max
Does anyone else get the feeling that Fisher's low risk approach to offense somehow restrains the Rams from scoring TD and instead leads to more FGs.
When the Rams have the ball with 2 min. left to play in the game and they are within 3 pts, I have total faith that they will get it done. I mean, I had no doubt that Bradford would get them in FG range and GZ would hit it last Sunday.
Interestingly enough, when the Rams have the ball with 2 min. left to play in the game and they are within 7 pts, I STILL have faith that they will get it done. Just like they did in Buffalo last year.
And yet, when they have the ball on the 3 yard line, first and goal, like they did after the TruJohnson pick, I had no faith that they'd score a TD.
I just don't get it. Why do they lock up during the game like that? Many of us blame either Shotty or Sam for not getting TDs in the Red Zone, but I think it may have something to do with Fisher's general approach of don't risk losing the FG until you can only win with a TD.
When the Rams have the ball with 2 min. left to play in the game and they are within 3 pts, I have total faith that they will get it done. I mean, I had no doubt that Bradford would get them in FG range and GZ would hit it last Sunday.
Interestingly enough, when the Rams have the ball with 2 min. left to play in the game and they are within 7 pts, I STILL have faith that they will get it done. Just like they did in Buffalo last year.
And yet, when they have the ball on the 3 yard line, first and goal, like they did after the TruJohnson pick, I had no faith that they'd score a TD.
I just don't get it. Why do they lock up during the game like that? Many of us blame either Shotty or Sam for not getting TDs in the Red Zone, but I think it may have something to do with Fisher's general approach of don't risk losing the FG until you can only win with a TD.