I was just about to post this.
Why I oughta....
Excellent points from Zach and Randy though - all around. Some are valid, some are objective, some are subjective, but the fact remains; he is the man for the job. Because he has the job. Last week didn't show me anything I should be overly concerned about, but as fans who have witnessed 65 losses against 15 wins, something's gotta change soon.
I'm a fairly patient guy, but I don't have an unlimited supply of patience either. 65 losses against 15 wins makes me dread watching football sometimes. Last week changed that. I haven't been on the edge of my seat since the Saints game last year. And before that, the edge of my seat went largely untested. I was juiced throughout that whole game against the Lions and that felt good.
My particular favorite part of that article came from Randy:
Finally, what was the problem with Sunday? Sure, he missed on a couple of throws. But there wasn’t a single quarterback in the league on Sunday that completed every throw. He had a passer rating of 105.1. Bradford didn’t throw an interception, one of thirteen quarterbacks that didn’t throw a pick. Those QB’s went 10-3, and the three who lost were Blaine Gabbert in overtime, and Eli Manning and Bradford late. If the Rams defense can make a single play in the final two Lions drives, the Rams win. He doesn’t throw picks, and if you don’t lose the game, you have a great chance to win it. Of course he’s the man for the job.
Ahhhhgreeeeed.