- Joined
- Sep 7, 2011
- Messages
- 6,454
- Name
- Main Hook
Yeah we could use one, I guess. It's the difference in making a really good group into a potential great one. Compared to difference makers we could have at the within the first two rounds, I don't see the need to draft one before round 3. Of course this barring we trade down twice and stock up on second round picks.
Some questions need answers if we do decide to go LB over positions like OG and WR. The main one is are we OK with what we have? That's a screaming no around here when talking OG. It gets muddied when talking about WR.
-Do we really need an upgrade to Dunbar? I say yes, but we could always do it next year.
-What do we have in Ray-Ray "Knucklehead" Armstrong? Not really sure just yet.
-Really the only WR I want is Watkins so if we don't draft him then I don't want one this year.
However, we do need some depth guys that can be had with our late round picks. Apparently we have several coming after reading a post from yesterday.
In a nutshell, Clowney, Watkins, and/or OG-C need to be our focus in the first two rounds. LB should be an after thought. We can't do it all.
Some questions need answers if we do decide to go LB over positions like OG and WR. The main one is are we OK with what we have? That's a screaming no around here when talking OG. It gets muddied when talking about WR.
-Do we really need an upgrade to Dunbar? I say yes, but we could always do it next year.
-What do we have in Ray-Ray "Knucklehead" Armstrong? Not really sure just yet.
-Really the only WR I want is Watkins so if we don't draft him then I don't want one this year.
However, we do need some depth guys that can be had with our late round picks. Apparently we have several coming after reading a post from yesterday.
In a nutshell, Clowney, Watkins, and/or OG-C need to be our focus in the first two rounds. LB should be an after thought. We can't do it all.